The problem of "re-writing" it, is that a big part of it is properly written already, and one would only be changing some semantics here and there, and any other REAL change would be as much change as we're trying to do with allowing Ministers in the Senate. For instance, the "Council idea" I've been trying to spread around, much of it's base ideals are already practiced by this Senate, we are already a "council", we're already practicing part of Participative Democracy, and one could argue that there's a big leap from this to "soviet" council idea, but tbh most of the idea is already in motion. Fact is, Senate does have the power, what can a Delegate really do? He doesn't like one thing he can veto, that thing can be voted against by the Senate who already proposed the thing in the first place, which means, whatever the Senate wants, the Senate gets. IDK why you all go - "omg no the Delegate can't be a puppet of the senate, your council idea is stupid" - well guess what, he is bound to serve and we can have the first and the last word in any issue. All the "council idea" would do is create a different nuance, maybe open up more participation, but seems a lot of you don't like the idea so, there, I'm not going through with any of it's proposals.
I will oppose fiercely this monarchy crap but this brings up a different angle, we could RP a conflict, one could make Taijitu a monarchy, but others could form the Council (or any other name w/e i don't care). I've been trying to see if any of you are interested but seems not.
Other than that, all is good, just get everything started, games, quizes, spamming, recruitment, some military stuff so some of you can be entertained with.
I liked Oz's proposal for a turn based RPG set, idk what that entails but might be interesting.
