Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Citoyen reminder: Failure to participate in Daily Poll may result in being found guilty of enjoyment malcompliance.

Author Topic: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia  (Read 17519 times)

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #195 on: December 08, 2007, 12:32:14 AM »
whoo
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #196 on: December 08, 2007, 07:19:46 AM »
The only people allowed to post in the trial thread are the Justices, Prosecution and Defense. Anyone else posting will be considered a deliberate attempt to derail the trial. Any issues can be delivered to the Justices via a PM.

You can watch and read Bara but no posting...
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #197 on: December 08, 2007, 03:23:37 PM »
ok.
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Flemingovia

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • Official Taijitu Minister of Apathy
Re: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #198 on: December 11, 2007, 07:12:37 AM »
Is the trial being conducted in mime? It seems very quiet.


Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #199 on: December 11, 2007, 08:13:46 AM »
Well, its day two of the prosecution statements with their evidence...
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Allama

  • *
  • Posts: 6878
    • LibraryThing
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #200 on: December 11, 2007, 02:29:03 PM »
This is starting to become very concerning; we need the prosecution to present their case post haste or this trial will very nearly cease to be one.

Offline PoD Gunner

  • Praefectus praetorio.
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1935
  • Egrota Egrota Egrota!!!
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #201 on: December 11, 2007, 04:29:48 PM »
My apologies, RL issues have kept me away. It will be taken care of within the next 24 h.
Co-Founder of Taijitu
Former Delegate of The Lexicon (by mistake), The Rejected Realms (par force) and Taijitu (elected)
*Home of GMT* / www.nationstates.net/nation=red_kagran


Offline Allama

  • *
  • Posts: 6878
    • LibraryThing
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #202 on: December 11, 2007, 04:50:14 PM »
Yay, PoD is here!  All is now well in my little world.  :)

Offline Durnia

  • Full of Imperial Mattyness
  • *
  • Posts: 756
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #203 on: December 14, 2007, 08:26:46 PM »
Lol at Flem.
Nobody of importance.

Offline Myroria

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4345
Re: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #204 on: December 16, 2007, 07:05:18 PM »
PM me when you need my testimony.
"I assure you -- I will be quite content to be a mere mortal again, dedicated to my own amusements."

Offline Govindia

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • My Primary LJ
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #205 on: December 16, 2007, 08:15:10 PM »
Myro, please PM Osafune or Templarios, or TG me with your testimony.  We are waiting>
United States of Arvengovi - Citizenship obtained 8 Aug. 2007!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ambassador to The Exodus (14 Aug. 2007 - 14 Oct. 2007)

Offline Flemingovia

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • Official Taijitu Minister of Apathy
Re: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #206 on: December 18, 2007, 03:21:13 PM »
Quote
The behaviour of the MoRS shows that he did not just act because Govindia was a security threat, it was because he came from a feeder that was an active defender.

Does the defence seriously think I would have confirmed the forum restriction of anyone on the grounds they were an active defender?

Offline Govindia

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • My Primary LJ
Re: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #207 on: December 18, 2007, 03:27:06 PM »
Quote
The behaviour of the MoRS shows that he did not just act because Govindia was a security threat, it was because he came from a feeder that was an active defender.

Does the defence seriously think I would have confirmed the forum restriction of anyone on the grounds they were an active defender?

This thread is only for the defence, prosecution, and the Justices.  Please refrain from posting.  Thank you.
United States of Arvengovi - Citizenship obtained 8 Aug. 2007!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ambassador to The Exodus (14 Aug. 2007 - 14 Oct. 2007)

Offline Durnia

  • Full of Imperial Mattyness
  • *
  • Posts: 756
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #208 on: December 18, 2007, 03:59:29 PM »
No.

This is not how it works.

You do not give orders in my courtroom. You will be respectful, and do your best not to be a moron, that is, look at all the other posts in this thread, and see how many of those weren't from a justice, or your embarrassingly inept prosecution team.
Nobody of importance.

Offline Govindia

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 192
    • My Primary LJ
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #209 on: December 18, 2007, 04:27:50 PM »
No.

This is not how it works.

You do not give orders in my courtroom. You will be respectful, and do your best not to be a moron, that is, look at all the other posts in this thread, and see how many of those weren't from a justice, or your embarrassingly inept prosecution team.

With all due respect, Durnia, there are three justices currently involved in this trial.  If I recall correctly, you recused yourself.  Furthermore,  I object to such flaming language, accusing my DEFENCE team of being inept, when it is in no place for you as a justice to comment on the case when you have recused yourself, by standard ethics.  The three justices have stated that only the prosecution, defence, and those justices involved in the case can post, and no one else.  I do not see what the problem is in that policy to be understood, sir.
United States of Arvengovi - Citizenship obtained 8 Aug. 2007!
-------------------------------------------------------------
Ambassador to The Exodus (14 Aug. 2007 - 14 Oct. 2007)