Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Let's promote the adoption of the Revolutionary Calendar to advance the scientific timekeeping of the region!

Poll

Should more than one nation be allowed to claim sovereignty over a piece of territory?

Yes, and it must be recognized
No
It's up to a nation whether they'll recognize it or not
Only in certain situations (specify)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Joint Sovereignty  (Read 1930 times)

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Joint Sovereignty
« on: February 27, 2007, 03:47:44 PM »
Vote, expound, etc.
Logged


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Mercantilist States

  • *
  • Posts: 425
    • Mercantilist States Wiki
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2007, 04:22:23 PM »
I would think if there are nations that are allied that take a piece of land, they'd have joint sovereignty until it's partitioned out, kind of like WWII and Germany with the Allies..is that what you're asking?

Or do you mean permanently...if permanently..then I'd say put it to a vote case by case.
Logged
by the order of Anthony J. Washington, President of the Mercantilist States

Wiki|News|Department of Commerce|NationStates Page|Factbook

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2007, 04:24:58 PM »
Yes, permanently.
Logged


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2007, 08:48:51 PM »
Can you elaborate the choices further?  I am not sure if I understand exactly what the options mean.
Logged
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2007, 08:55:19 PM »
"Yes" means that in all cases where nations claim joint sovereignty, all nations must recognize it.

"No" means that joint sovereignty can never be recognized.

Three and four are self-explanatory.
Logged


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2007, 09:11:50 PM »
Joint recognizition upon approval of RP Council and cannot be counted as a colony.
Logged
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Talmann

  • *
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2007, 11:17:59 PM »
I'd say try it on a case by case situation. Aka Britain and France in WWI(I?) taking tracts of land in the Middle East securing their sovereignty. If that's all that the country is doing, then Yes. But if it turns out that the country is just their for economic/political (makes the leader look good, but not doing anything) issues, then a firm No.

At the least it'd give us more work...  :shrug:
Logged
Music is the key to the heart.

"Once art to me was something far off, unfathomable and unreachable... But I discovered that the real essence of art was not something high up and far off, it was right inside my ordinary daily self. If a musician wants to be a fine artist, he must first become a finer person. A work of art is the expression of a person's whole personality, sensibility, and ability." -Shinichi Suzuki

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Joint Sovereignty
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2007, 02:18:46 AM »
Why shouldn't it be counted as a colony, Bustos?

And Talmann, I'd strongly suggest getting another example, because the one you chose would, under your system, merit a "no."

On a related subject, see my "Definitions" thread.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2007, 06:12:40 PM by Gallipoli-China »
Logged


ProP Spokesperson
Pages: [1]
« previous next »