Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Citoyen reminder: Failure to participate in Daily Poll may result in being found guilty of enjoyment malcompliance.

Author Topic: Discussion: Due Process Act  (Read 2772 times)

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Discussion: Due Process Act
« on: June 14, 2011, 05:56:45 AM »
While I'm spamming us up with informal discussion threads like this, I suppose I should bring up the proposal for due process and court cases and such that me and Elu worked a bit on way ago. As a party that values justice, I would think establishing due process would be our prerogative. My first thought looking at it was wow, this is longer than I remember, but then again something as important as this might warrant strict procedures and standards.

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #1 on: June 14, 2011, 02:16:24 PM »
It certainly is. The Act could definitely use some grammar fixes, which I may be able to make to the wiki at some point soon.

I also think we should look carefully at Retrials and Obstruction. In particular it may be more effective if the Court can mete out punishments for obstruction on the spot, without a separate trial.
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #2 on: June 14, 2011, 06:43:05 PM »
Another possibility I'd considered, if we want to be a bit less picky for the sake of this being a game with certain realities, is to instead of having warrants is to if the government makes an arrest for the matter to be presented to the Court to decide whether there's reason to continue holding them and conduct a trial.

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2011, 04:50:21 PM »
Well, I've done some more work on it and tried to whittle it down to the necessary basics, but there's still work to do be done and I'd like input on whether I've cut out too much. I cut a lot out of the presentation of cases, that's for certain. Do we trust the Court to let people speak XD
« Last Edit: June 18, 2011, 04:58:17 PM by Gulliver »

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2011, 06:35:13 PM »
the differences

I'll examine in a bit.
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2011, 05:50:51 AM »
Revisions by the Ccngress so far:

diff
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2011, 04:13:27 PM »
Okay, since there wasn't much discussion, and since this should really be accomplished before the elections, the vote on the Due Process Act is up.  Summary of the June-July 2011 Senate: clarified the existing Ministries and Oaths Act, introduced (probably will pass) the Due Process Act.  Proposed business for the next Senate: define procedures, amend Constitution to provide for Schulze voting.


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Discussion: Due Process Act
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2011, 09:20:39 PM »
Those sound like good ideas. We also had a whole agenda of possible amendments that we left up for discussion: we should probably resume that congress at some time. On the point of procedures, I think me and Elu drafted something way back when if you want a place to start from.