Complaint Against Validean Navy

[Pachamama]

It seems that the Valideen Navy's equipment is not as advanced as you tought.
Also sending in four aircraft for a recon mission seems overdoing it, the data you provided does not ascertain that those aircraft were armed. Painting your vessel with targeting lasers does not constitute an attack or present a prove of the aircraft in question being armed.
Also we do not know the type and equipment of the Validean aircraft the presence of painting lasers does not prove the presence of weapons.
If you read again trough the report of your very own captain, a man which I am sure knows what he is doing and is well able to put things in order even under stress, you see that he activated the transponder after hailing the Validean vessel and receiving an answer.
I must say that the Validean captain might have been wise to tell him what kind of attack he believed it was.
On the other hand, again keeping in order with your captains document it seems that the Validean broke off their "attack" 10 minutes after the transponder signal was send that-according to your captain "Stated our in - hostilities" but said nothing about the intent of your maneuvers.
To me it seems that in both Navy's cooler heads prevailed. So let us honor the restraint of both Captain's by not blowing this in an international incident on the diplomatic level gentlemen.

[Union]

ooc: They were carrying weapons

Our government will drop the charges provided that such an incident will be resolve more accordingly in the future by trigger happy Validean personnel.

[Delfos]

ooc: There's allot of things that would mistrust the 'lack of tech' of Val's navy. 1st of all, he's not in the IPO, he would never share his vessel codes with the IPO codes, even if IPO codes are available to anyone. 2nd of all, Loyan is PI while Val is AC, I guess it's quite normal that neither Loyan had our codes nor Val had Loyan codes, so your electronic bs can be heavily discredited. Last of all, you've entered a blockade area controlled by DYSFOR and Canada, no you had no right to trespass without permission, and nothing happened so it wasn't considered an attack, plus the psychological damage done to your "Superintendents" is worthless, unless they gone crasy and need psychological treatment or something.
Try to find some other way to frame Validus.

[Union]

ooc: Calm down Delfos...I already stood down the charges. In any case, no one but DYSFOR members had recognized your jurisdiction of the blockade area, hence any area outside Dysanii and the 250 km watermark (which even there you have no real claim) would had been international waters in international legality. Claimed ownership of international waters itself is illegal, is it not?

And this is exactly what I'm attempt to reinforce, the illegitimacy of DYSFOR claimed controls of this zone. Your claim is based on the tip of a sword. Framing Validus is only secondary.

[Validus]

To: IPO
From: Validus

The information provided to you by the loyanese Representative is incorrect. We have video images from the cameras on board the aircraft that show the Loyanese running to their guns. We will admit that our Aircraft were armed as two of the fighters were flying the CAP (Combat Air Patrol) and the other two were launched with a standard set of Anti-Ship Weaponry. This was only done after the Flag Ships Counter EW detachment had the target vessel on our charts lighting up like a Christmas tree. And that takes alot of power to cause that and jam our Nav and Comms.

~Thanato

[Union]

ooc: What guns?