^ Sort of related, but barely.
Going back to the PC/Console argument, I personally prefer console. The only PC games I play are Battlefield 2 and Battlefield 2142. And Flight Sim, occasionally. I am a Nintendo fan through and through. The Wii is absolutely awesome. I have Red Steel, the main FPS for the console, and it is great. I move my hand in exactly the right place every time. And then, because it's motion sensitive, if I hold 'A' and push the remote forward, it zooms in!
As for the PC games, I don't think that there will ever be a console that is as good as a PC for flexibility. Let's face it. You can't really mod a console game. The PS3 might be able to do it, but I don't care because it is a pile of copied rubbish. They took one look at the Wii Remote and said, "We want that motion sensing capability so that we look as technologically advanced as them." You could tell that they had copied the idea because at E3 of that year their controllers didn't have any motion sensing abilities. Anyway, enough of my PS3 slagging.
As to what is better, there isn't one. Apart from the fact that is impossible to make opinion fact, it's true (in my opinion
). It all depends on what you want to play. PCs, although they are very flexible, cost a lot of money. You can get the same fun, if not more, from a console. But, if you are a hardcore online gamer, PCs will do it for you again. The latest consoles all have internet capability, but you can't beat a PC at it's own game.
And Empire, there is a huge new genre of games coming out to the Nintendo systems. They are educational or fitness orientated. That's a new one, eh?