Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Let us develop the University into a world-class school, and the centerpiece of Taijituan culture!

Author Topic: Concerning the mind and repentance  (Read 11296 times)

Offline Solnath

  • Solus Victor
  • *
  • Posts: 5920
  • Pamfu desu!
Concerning the mind and repentance
« on: July 12, 2007, 06:52:51 PM »
To enlighten the masses.



<Talmann> but you ruined my fun...
<Balthazar> Good.
<Balthazar> You deserved it.
* Talmann mumbles under his breath
<Talmann> fun-killer
<Balthazar> Repent, ye of little faith.
<Talmann> actually, I of NO faith
<Talmann> thus, I need not repent
<Balthazar> You have no faith in anything?
<Talmann> not in the religious terms
<Balthazar> So you do have faith.
<Talmann> which is where you got the quote
<Balthazar> Contexts can be changed.
<Talmann> and I responded in like fashion
<Talmann> And I still need not repent
<Balthazar> Why not?
* Khab gets the popcorn. Another battle of wits!
<Balthazar> You are of some faith, are you not?
<Talmann> Why should I?
<Balthazar> Have you not broken against that faith?
<Talmann> no
<Balthazar> Have you not sinned against yourself?
<Talmann> nope
<Balthazar> Oooh, a liar.
<Talmann> Not recently enough
<Balthazar> Time is irrelevant.
<Talmann> Already "repented" since I last broke my "faith"
<Balthazar> The order of our experience is not the key factor.
* Kor has joined #taijitu
<Balthazar> Why did you break against your faith?
<Talmann> and you have asked me to repent for your killing of fun, of which i should not
<Talmann> hey Kor
<Balthazar> I have told you to repent for your weak attempts at humour.
<Talmann> I shall not tell, it is of my own personal matter
* Korinna has quit IRC (Quit: (Bursts into flames))
<Balthazar> Personal matters matter only if some external observer can evaluate them and thus give them value.
<Talmann> ahh, it was fun though. And i need not repent for that
<Talmann> humor humors
* Kor is now known as Korinna
<Talmann> and the act of humoring is good
<Balthazar> You should repent the fact that you see no need to repent.
<Talmann> therefore I have not sinned
* ChanServ sets mode: +o Korinna
<Talmann> meh
<Balthazar> For arrogance is the greatest sin of man.
<Talmann> as should you, weakling
<Talmann> oh, no... I see reason to repent
<Balthazar> My humanity is... included, but not limited to.
<Talmann> but you are not qualified in my eyes for me to repent to
<Balthazar> I repent, but I understand why.
<Balthazar> Do not repent to others, but be true to yourself.
<Talmann> Naturally
<Balthazar> You cannot live without remaining steadfast with yourself.
<Talmann> therefore why ask you me to repent to you
<Balthazar> I did not.
<Balthazar> I told you to repent.
<Balthazar> Repenting has no object.
<Balthazar> Only a subject.
* Allama digs into the popcorn.
<Talmann> and how could you tell if I had or had not done what you asked?
<Balthazar> I do not need it, I can see the effects later on.
<Balthazar> Repentance shines through.
<Talmann> ahh, RIGHT
<Talmann> [/sarcasm]
<Allama> But how can one judge the repentance of another?  Can you feel his soul?  See his thoughts?
<Balthazar> When you acknowledge what you have done and - more importantly - why, you grow in spirit.
<Balthazar> I can see their happiness.
<Talmann> So you are saying if anyone "repents" it will change them into a better person/
<Balthazar> Their backpack will lighten up.
<Allama> This is true, but the outer appearance does not change quickly to reflect it in many cases.
<Talmann> ?
<Balthazar> Outer appearance is irrelevant for empaths.
<Balthazar> Their spirits will be lighter and their hearts as well, Tal.
<Allama> Can you feel his essence through the internet?
<Balthazar> (Reference was from my blog.)
<Balthazar> Weakened, but to a certain extent.
<Schwarzchild> Work, blech
<Schwarzchild> Later
* Schwarzchild has left #taijitu
<Allama> I am impressed.  You have much to teach us.
<Talmann> oh... so if someone takes pleasure and light-heartedness in macabre things, that repenting would cause him to take more pleasure from those things?
* Allama sits on the floor, waiting for instruction in the ways of electronic empathy.
<Balthazar> Pleasure is not derived directly from actions and the world around us.
<Talmann> what makes a spirit "lighter" or a heart, for that matter
<Balthazar> It comes from living.
<Balthazar> Repentance and self-discovery.
<Allama> The word has many cultural connotations; it may not mean to you what it means to someone else.
<Allama> For the record.
<Talmann> for, what is a spirit but an imagined thing by man, and it would be physically impossible to remove mass from the heart
* Khab wonders what her electronic essence would feel like. And also if it would smell like cookies.
<Talmann> by "repenting"
<Talmann> What kind of cookies
<Balthazar> What is the world, but a figment of imagination?
<Talmann> indeed
<Talmann> but then, what is imagination?
<Balthazar> It is irrelevant whether something essential is illusion because those who live and feel and experience - do so.
<Allama> Consciousness.  Your consciousness, of course, might ne naught but the imagining of another being.  If the entire universe can be thought of by one being, what is to say you ARE that being and not another figment?
<Balthazar> Truth and falsehood are moralistic and subjective terms.
<Balthazar> The spirit is your persona.
<Allama> ^^^^Agreed, Bal.
<Balthazar> You are your spirit.
<Talmann> who is to say that?
<Balthazar> I am, because I have gone down the rabbit hole.
<Balthazar> I tell you of Oz.
<Allama> Some believe that, as I do, but others believe that the pysical body is who you are.  Who is to say this is more or less valid than another belief?
<Balthazar> (Not St. Oz)
<Allama> Oooh, mixing stories?  Fanfic crossovers.
<Talmann> who is to say that it is not anything but chemical reactions, causing false colors to be drived inside the head, and interpreted by other chemicals
<Balthazar> Tal, so what if it is?
<Allama> Good question!
<Balthazar> It still is what it is experienced to be.
<Talmann> then we are nothing but masses of carbon compounds, destroying this figment called Earth slowly but surely
<Balthazar> Then we are, so what?
<Balthazar> If this all is just an illusion of a dream in something's imagination, so what?
<Balthazar> We are and hence we can be.
<Talmann> I have told you, and you are not a toddler, asking the simple yet complex why question
<Balthazar> And we should.
<Balthazar> Use punctuation.
<Balthazar> It helps.
<Talmann> [/argument]
<Balthazar> Question marks are great.
<Khab> ?! is even better.
<Balthazar> Should that be interpreted as retreat, Tal?
<Balthazar> Fear of going on?
<Talmann> meh, when arguing, it hinders my ability to get words out faster.
<Balthazar> Getting restless?
<Talmann> nah. just too much smart talk for one day.
<Talmann> heh
<Balthazar> So yes.
<Talmann> Mach' mir nicht auf Cryllic sprechen
* Balthazar gets on a speaking block.
<Balthazar> Hear ye, hear ye, Tal's dreams are doomed!
<Balthazar> He lacks the will to trudge on!
<Talmann> yet you still haven't gotten me to repent
* Thyatira has left #taijitu
* Balthazar steps down.
<Balthazar> Because you refuse.
* Talmann whacks Balt with a fish
<Balthazar> And hence, you are doomed to live forever in cyclical repetition.
<Balthazar> Well, technically no.
<Balthazar> That isn't living.
<Talmann> ok... I'm good with that
<Talmann> fix my mistakes
<Talmann> look at Groundhog Day
<Balthazar> Why should I fix others mistakes?
<Balthazar> Tell me.
<Talmann> I'd get bored... but se la vi
<Talmann> Have you not seen the movie?
<Balthazar> What responsibility do I have to do what others cannot do?
<Talmann> oh, sorry
<Balthazar> I have, unfortunately.
<Talmann> let me clarify
<Talmann> I could fix my mistakes
<Balthazar> Thought so.
<Talmann> cyclical living, and reincarnation, here I come...
<Balthazar> Cyclical repetition is a state where you do not learn new things.
<Balthazar> Mistakes cannot be fixed.
<Talmann> so?
<Balthazar> They are repeated forevermore.
<Talmann> and?
<Talmann> who are you to say that occurs?
<Balthazar> I have seen it.
<Balthazar> Living is not achieved to its potential.
<Talmann> you would be promoting life after death
<Talmann> the same life, but still
<Balthazar> The concept of afterlife is not the concern here.
<Talmann> and one cannot know this without dying one's self
<Balthazar> Cyclical repetition is when you are married for 60 years, go to church on Sundays and do everything the same way over and over again, regardless of the events in the surrounding environment.
<Talmann> you cannot say that cyclical repetition occurs, or will occur for that matter
<Balthazar> It occurs, I know it all too well.
<Talmann> No, that's just stupid people who want to do nothing with their lives. [/my opinion]
<Balthazar> And?
<Balthazar> "It doesn't happen except for stupid people" is your argument?
<Balthazar> If it happens for anyone, it happens.
<Talmann> those people repeat things within one life, not repeat their entire life from birth to death
<Balthazar> Ah, so you have misunderstood me.
<Balthazar> That is exactly the concept of cyclical repetition.
<Talmann> I interpret your "cyclical repetition" that way
<Talmann> ah
<Balthazar> One life is all we can prove to exist, hence I do not speak only theoretically.
<Talmann> so you doom me to that, eh?
<Balthazar> No, you do so.
<Balthazar> Because you refuse to reflect on your actions.
<Balthazar> And more importantly, on your faith.
<Talmann> I am too strong willed a person to be doomed to repeat myself, week to week
<Talmann> or, at least, I think so of myself
<Balthazar> Many have said so before you and many have fallen to the curse.
<Balthazar> Why rely on luck only?
<Talmann> besides, I look forward to traveling the world.
<Balthazar> If you control yourself, you can control your life.
<Talmann> what is luck, eh/
<Talmann> ?
<Talmann> I do control myself
<Balthazar> Why rely on probabilities acting out in your favour, then.
<Talmann> not the world controlling me.
<Balthazar> Are you sure?
<Balthazar> When is the last time someone influenced you greatly.
<Balthazar> Emotionally, intellectually?
<Talmann> Yes. If anything, it is chemical reactions acting within my body mass in correct succession, that controls me
<Talmann> Define emotions and intellect
<Balthazar> I think you should understand them well enough to survive this conversation, stop trying to derail.
<Talmann> hehe
<Balthazar> When's the last time someone made you feel sad or bad or mad?
* Thel has joined #taijitu
* ChanServ sets mode: +o Thel
<Talmann> and why cannot I derail?
<Balthazar> Because this is an exceptionally important discussion.
<Talmann> annoying, as an emotion, is occurring this minute, likely within both of us
<Balthazar> If you do not see that directly, trust me.
<Balthazar> Not in me.
Posted on: 12 July 2007, 21:52:39
<Allama> Annoying or annoyance?  ^_-
<Balthazar> I am a blank slate at the moment.
<Talmann> both, Al'
<Balthazar> There is no emotion needed as this is a rational process.
<Talmann> a, yes... the student.
<Talmann> Always eager to learn
<Balthazar> You can say I'm wrong but it will only be convincing if you understand what I'm saying.
<Talmann> no emotion... right. 'Eager' being my key word in the last sentence. But I digress
<Darthimus-Prime> Balthazar eh? hmmm
<Talmann> the world does not control me
<Talmann> Solnath
<Talmann> aka Soly
<Balthazar> Learning is growth, growth leads to strength and strength leads to the control of your will.
<Talmann> again, we do not agree on a point, that we may be just sequences of chemical reactions
<Balthazar> I do not disagree or agree with that statement.
<Talmann> there is no "will", just a heavier amount of chemical reactions
<Balthazar> I do not need to, for it is not concerned in this topic.
<Balthazar> If there is no will, how do you do anything?
<Talmann> there is no strength, just more muscle tissue formed in the body mass
<Balthazar> Not that kind of strength, silly.
<Balthazar> Strength and will are compound terms.
<Talmann> Chemical reactions, happening at certain times within one's brain tissue
<Balthazar> All personal actions spring forth from either the will or the subconciousness.
<Balthazar> Why does it matter what creates the will and the subconcious part of the mind?
<Talmann> define what these terms are, in terms of my reference
<Balthazar> The will is the part of your mind that you are aware of and can control.
<Balthazar> The subconcious is the rest of it.
<Balthazar> Your mind is the sum of your perceptions and experiences.
<Talmann> how can you "control" chemical reactions
<Talmann> ?
<Balthazar> I do not know, but it happens.
<Balthazar> Can you not think for yourself?
<Talmann> Ha HA!
<Talmann> I sense a weakness
<Talmann> a part that you do not know
<Balthazar> Your extravagant use of the term "chemical reactions" implies that what we think and act are only controlled by them.
<Balthazar> Actually, concerning the control of chemical reactions...
<Talmann> your body reacts to what light reflections come in through the eyes, forming a "mental picture".
<Talmann> the chemical process then will take that "picture" and react to it.
<Talmann> For instance
<Balthazar> Hush.
<Talmann> Your body is low on H2O
<Talmann> light reflections depict a glass container, with h2o inside it
<Talmann> your body then sends electrical pulses to the muscles stretching them out to grasp the container and pull it up to the mouth and tipping the cup so that the h2o goes into the body
<Balthazar> The nervous system receives input at a certain pace and reacts to this information. The rate of this process defines the "height" of the creature's sentience and when it reaches a certain threshold, it warps itself into a new dimension where thought and "advanced chemical reaction control" is possible.
<Balthazar> You talk of the body, not the mind.
<Balthazar> The mind controls the body through chemical and physical reactions.
<Talmann> exactly... but then what chemical reactions form the mind.
<Talmann> ?
<Balthazar> As said before, the structure forms the mind.
<Talmann> what structure?
<Balthazar> Enough ropes tied into a big-ass knot mean that in addition to having just ropes you have... a big-ass knot!
<Balthazar> The nervous system and its reactionary movement with the input and output streams.
<Talmann> so... metaphorically speaking...
<Talmann> you are saying
<Talmann> enough chemicals put together forms the mind?
<Balthazar> Enough chemicals put together working efficiently enough and a mind can exist.
<Balthazar> That mind can be destroyed or broken, of course.
<Balthazar> But it should not be, because who knows what enough mind can create?
<Talmann> but how can chemicals be efficient? Efficiency is a man-made concept
<Balthazar> Efficiency is a man-defined concept.
<Balthazar> Work over time.
<Balthazar> Very natural.
<Talmann> chemicals are random, at least in the fact that they have no time-line in which they "should" do something
<Balthazar> Chemicals are not random.
<Balthazar> A single atom might be vaguely random and quantum.
<Talmann> they have places, they will react when other chemicals touch them
<Balthazar> Highly developed carbon-based life-forms are not.
<Talmann> therefore, the movement of the chemicals could be said to be random
<Balthazar> And those places and other chemicals have been developed in 4.5 billion years.
<Balthazar> It's not random.
<Balthazar> Natural selection has made sure that it isn't.
<Talmann> and therefore, the time between reactions is random
<Balthazar> Seldom so.
<Balthazar> Human beings are a result of focus and development created by a random process, granted.
<Talmann> yes
<Balthazar> But, the result of that process has spawned circumstances suitable to sustain sentience and sentient beings can influence events over chemical reactions.
<Talmann> what is sentience but what we have discussed??!
<Balthazar> You say it is random.
<Talmann> sentience is doo-doo! nothing but sequences of chemical reaction in the complex form of the mind!
<Balthazar> I say it is the result of a random process but no longer constrained by the environment only.
<Balthazar> Complex enough to influence themselves!
<Talmann> you said it yourself: enough chemicals put together and a mind can exist
<Balthazar> The very definition of sentience.
<Balthazar> Yes.
<Balthazar> And then there is a mind.
<Balthazar> Which isn't chemicals.
<Balthazar> Greater than the sum of its parts.
<Talmann> what is it then
<Balthazar> It's Awesome.
<Balthazar> It's the mind.
<Talmann> because something has to exist
<Balthazar> It is humanity.
<Talmann> it has to be matter
<Balthazar> Why?
<Talmann> otherwise what is it
<Talmann> ?
<Balthazar> Something else?
<Talmann> like?
<Balthazar> The physical world mightn't be all there is.
<Balthazar> Ether cookies?
<Balthazar> I don't know, but I want to find out.
<Talmann> as do i
<Balthazar> And to find out, I need to develop the mind.
<Talmann> because otherwise, we cannot continue our discussion
<Balthazar> And not hide in a little box titled "no free will."
<Talmann> what is the mind composed of? matter? if so, what? something else? if so, what, and what are its properties?
<Talmann> I can see a scientific study titled such
<Balthazar> Maybe the intense chemical activity has created the biological equivalent of a space-time rapture that actually leads to another dimension we cannot perceive in any way.
<Talmann> or starting with such
<Balthazar> What is science but the study of matter?
<Talmann> perhaps...
<Talmann> true
<Balthazar> If something is outside matter, it isn't science, but it can still exist.
<Talmann> we cannot know, it is above our "knowing"
<Balthazar> As it should be, makes life fun.
<Balthazar> Gives us something to aim at.
<Talmann> which leads to another query, how does the memory work, then.
<Talmann> ?
<Balthazar> I know the answer, but can't remember.
<Balthazar> Poorly, I suppose.
<Talmann> exactly
<Balthazar> Maybe the biological rapture takes metaphysical content floating around and sticks them in a box from which it can look for it when needed.
<Balthazar> And then plugs it into the brain, converting it into impulses for the nervous system and affecting our bodies, causing us to perceive memory.
<Balthazar> That would work.
<Balthazar> The mind is the name of the nexus of operations and the body is just one branch of the government of the mind.
* Balthazar pokes Tal.
<Talmann> huh?
<Talmann> oh, sorry
<Talmann> was reading forum
<Talmann> hmm
<Talmann> heh, good metaphor
<Talmann> I suppose it is possible
<Balthazar> And hence, in an infinite cosmos, it exists.
<Balthazar> And so, science is not the ultimate extension of learning.
<Talmann> quite right
<Talmann> Sol, SCALE has a request
<Balthazar> So you should repent so that you do not fall into the cycle of blind science worship.
<Talmann> who says I will?
<Balthazar> No one, but it would benefit you to do so.
* Limi has joined #taijitu
* ChanServ sets mode: +o Limi
<Balthazar> So it is... logical for you to do so.
<Balthazar> After all, you lose nothing in a metaphysical attempt.
<Talmann> like I said, S.C.A.L.E. has a request for you
<Balthazar> Already there.
<Khab> oooooh a sucker.  er... I mean customer.
<Balthazar> But truly, you should repent, because it will help you understand the other branches of your government.
<Balthazar> Hmm, seems to me I get to keep my tribal immunity necklace.
<Balthazar> Go me.
<Talmann> and should I do so, how will it help me?
<Balthazar> Repentance is the process of training the mind-nexus and it is through the mind-nexus that your access and information flow to the other branches increases and becomes easier.
<Talmann> ...
<Balthazar> Understand, amigo?
<Talmann> I will not repent, but I will streamline my information flow
<Balthazar> How will you do that?
* Korinna has quit IRC (Ping timeout)
<Talmann> by training my mind-nexus
<Balthazar> And that is accomplished by repenting.
<Balthazar> Repentance is also known as thinking.
<Talmann> ... No, i refuse to repent
<Balthazar> Really?


Boom.
Neutral Evil

Offline Khem

  • Pha bless you.
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6171
  • OG-Citizen
    • Khem
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2007, 07:08:40 PM »
wow i remember when you grilled me like that back in the day. but yep thats 1 point for soly, 0 for talmann.

Peoples Confederation of Holy Isles of al'Khem
:tai: Persona :tai: Worldbuilding Guide :tai: Nation of al'Khem :tai:

Offline Allama

  • *
  • Posts: 6878
    • LibraryThing
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2007, 07:10:15 PM »
Stir the pot, stir the pot...
My question - If emotions are nothing but chemical reactions, wouldn't the sheer complexity of human chemically-derived emotion be counter-evolutionary?  All human emotions can find a base in fear, lust, hunger, or other survival-related impulses, but we have evolved so far beyond the instinctual origins of them to possess such incredible layers upon layers of emotion that I cannot think of a practical purpose for them.

Offline Talmann

  • *
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2007, 09:57:22 PM »
Oi! No point for him, he didn't make me repent! None the less, I am proud to have been able to withstand the grilling monster that is Soly. And Al', I ask you this, what is evolution but a slight change in chemical composition over time? Emotions are just hormones, or chemical compounds, that affect the mind-nexus and affect it in a way to produce a reaction to solve the deficit of what the body needs.
Music is the key to the heart.

"Once art to me was something far off, unfathomable and unreachable... But I discovered that the real essence of art was not something high up and far off, it was right inside my ordinary daily self. If a musician wants to be a fine artist, he must first become a finer person. A work of art is the expression of a person's whole personality, sensibility, and ability." -Shinichi Suzuki

Offline Allama

  • *
  • Posts: 6878
    • LibraryThing
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2007, 02:16:07 PM »
I agree with you on that point, hence my question.  Why, from an evolutionary standpoint, would it have been to the benefit of the human race's survival to evolve brain chemical reactions that create such complex emotions, ones that often hinder us in the attempt to live from day to day?  Such changes should not occur without purpose.

Offline Talmann

  • *
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2007, 02:27:47 PM »
What is purpose to an element? The only thing that elements do is move, form compounds, and that's about it. They need no purpose, if a chemical or energy source (being light or heat) makes itself available at a certain time, it will cause the reaction at that time, creating the "emotion".

As a side note: guys, don't EVER try to explain life this way to your girlfriends. Trust me, I tried and failed...
Music is the key to the heart.

"Once art to me was something far off, unfathomable and unreachable... But I discovered that the real essence of art was not something high up and far off, it was right inside my ordinary daily self. If a musician wants to be a fine artist, he must first become a finer person. A work of art is the expression of a person's whole personality, sensibility, and ability." -Shinichi Suzuki

Offline Allama

  • *
  • Posts: 6878
    • LibraryThing
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2007, 02:43:57 PM »
I'm not asking if the chemicals themselves have a purpose; I'm asking for the purpose of the change.  We both know evolution favors changes that give an organism an edge to survive, as those unable to adapt to environmental changes die off.  Thus, changes that are not beneficial do not continue to be implemented by the simple fact that they are not passed on genetically.  Changes are passed on when they benefit the organism in question.

(To reply by saying that changes have no purpose, you must then deny that evolution exists.)

This leads me to believe that a mind and/or spirit must exist beyond chemical reactions, as there is not a physical need to be satisfied by deep, complex emotions.

Offline Talmann

  • *
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2007, 03:11:22 PM »
Yes, this is what Soly and I concluded. That the mind-nexus must be created with something that is beyond human comprehension, because we do not know why or how it controls these chemical reactions. And btw, satisfaction itself is an emotion, therefore an emotion requires other emotions, creating a loop with the only way out going to the mind-nexus. And you are also wrong in the sense that changes can still have no purpose, and yet evolution can still exist. I do not deny that there are changes, I simply state that they have no true purpose when viewed from the atomic scale.
Music is the key to the heart.

"Once art to me was something far off, unfathomable and unreachable... But I discovered that the real essence of art was not something high up and far off, it was right inside my ordinary daily self. If a musician wants to be a fine artist, he must first become a finer person. A work of art is the expression of a person's whole personality, sensibility, and ability." -Shinichi Suzuki

Offline Tacolicious

  • Your Friendly Neighborhood Tacoman
  • *
  • Posts: 4898
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #8 on: July 13, 2007, 06:26:09 PM »
If the mind is nothing more then a series of chemical reactions then explain the following:

1)If it is only a matter of the right chemicals in the right proportions then could you please add all the chemicals that make a brain, throw the mixture into a blender and have a mind come out?
2)If it is only a chemical reaction then why can two chemically identical minds (identical twins being the best noteable example) have such varying reactions?

I think it can be safely said that if the mind is only chemical reactions that it is then a system of emergent properties. Meaning that the outputs of the system far exceed the capabilities of the base of it's construction. As such even if the brain is merely chemical (and it's not, there's also all those nuerons firing energy about, and we're learning even those simple neuron bursts are far more complex then we thought them to be even 5 yeas ago) then because it is a system which exceeds the properties of it's base, it's base cannot be used as the sole factor in considering it's function. Our current understanding of the mind does not disprove the existence of the soul merely because it can not quantify it. The inability to find a thing is insufficient proof of it's non-existence.

I however do not repent for any of my actions. I accept responsibility for the things I have done and learn from them. I have made my own choices of my own free will, my will is as free as the scope of my imagination and the scope of the mind is infinite. As such forgiveness from a spooky nether essence does not interest me. Repenting is not the solution to avoid a cyclical life, learning from ones mistakes and not living in the past seems the better solution. If any Gods want to object to the way of my life they can certainly try - and get an ear full in return -, but every experience I have had has been a valuable one even if they weren't "the right" thing to do, how can we have comparison without contrast? Even then if the universe if infinite then what falls on the right or wrong side of the line depends on where you choose to place your centre dot since the line is infinite (without edges, thus without centre). So why should one repent for having a valuable experience to learn from?

Also what makes something viewed from the atomic scale any more or less relevant then something viewed from the galactic, personal, societal or quantum scale? The atomic scale is like any other scale, It is a whole made of parts and a part of a larger whole.
« Last Edit: July 13, 2007, 06:33:36 PM by Tacolicious »
http://www.nationstates.net/wheresoever

"Reality is an illusion albeit a persistant one"
"Wisest is he who knows he is not wise"
"Nothing is fun when you have to do it, that's why you don't see a lot of old whores giggling over sex"


Delicious Comrade of the most Awesome Party

Offline Talmann

  • *
  • Posts: 2491
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #9 on: July 13, 2007, 06:35:13 PM »
1) I am not a chemist, and am not sure of what exactly would make up a brain. A blender would, to me, seem to crude a device anyways. But I get your point. As stated before, we do not know exactly what makes a mind-nexus what it is.
2) In the case of identical twins, their bodies (and thus their minds) are being stimulated by different and varying amounts of chemicals and energy. An example: they aren't always eating the same thing, therefore different chemical compounds are being introduced to their bodies.

We didn't say that the soul doesn't exist, Taco. I agree wholly with your emboldened statement. And again, mind-nexus = unknown.

I completely agree with your last paragraph. I would likely have said the same thing, had I thought of it that way. So eat Taco, Soly!
Music is the key to the heart.

"Once art to me was something far off, unfathomable and unreachable... But I discovered that the real essence of art was not something high up and far off, it was right inside my ordinary daily self. If a musician wants to be a fine artist, he must first become a finer person. A work of art is the expression of a person's whole personality, sensibility, and ability." -Shinichi Suzuki

Offline Tacolicious

  • Your Friendly Neighborhood Tacoman
  • *
  • Posts: 4898
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #10 on: July 13, 2007, 06:49:46 PM »
So if the only reason for the twins having a different reaction to the same stimuli is the chemical ins then could you take two identical twins and provide them with the exact same chemical inputs and expect to get identical outs? If this is true then where is the soul in this equation? It seems to me that the chemical ins are not enough to explain the variety of humanity - which greatly exceeds the known chemical compounds of the human body.

I just get the feeling that by dumbing the body and mind down to a test tube, you're over looking far too much and drawing conclusions on insufficient and biased data. I think you're taking this with entirely too scientific a view even though you lack the scientific knowledge to work with. Science and spirituality are like a candle burning on both ends; it doesn't matter which end you hold too high either way you get burnt.
http://www.nationstates.net/wheresoever

"Reality is an illusion albeit a persistant one"
"Wisest is he who knows he is not wise"
"Nothing is fun when you have to do it, that's why you don't see a lot of old whores giggling over sex"


Delicious Comrade of the most Awesome Party

Offline Khablan

  • *
  • Posts: 1802
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #11 on: July 13, 2007, 07:41:05 PM »
For the record, the term 'identical twins' is misleading.  They aren't literally identical. 
For all the news, check out our Community Office!

Got questions?  We got answers!  Come see our Information Section!

Official welcome wagon of Taijitu, Co-Minister of Community and Recruitment. Taijitu's ambassador to TWP, Madre Califidrix of the Order of Gryphons. 

Also unofficial forum mom - provider of various sources of solace for the soul, including but not limited to cookies, hugs, and hot cocoa.


Offline Tacolicious

  • Your Friendly Neighborhood Tacoman
  • *
  • Posts: 4898
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #12 on: July 13, 2007, 09:47:12 PM »
maybe not 100% but pretty damn close. Still the best example I could think of in real world terms.
http://www.nationstates.net/wheresoever

"Reality is an illusion albeit a persistant one"
"Wisest is he who knows he is not wise"
"Nothing is fun when you have to do it, that's why you don't see a lot of old whores giggling over sex"


Delicious Comrade of the most Awesome Party

Offline Solnath

  • Solus Victor
  • *
  • Posts: 5920
  • Pamfu desu!
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #13 on: July 15, 2007, 09:40:23 PM »
First of all, the word "repent" in any of its forms was used to mean exactly what Taco said he does: thinking and reflecting on past actions. I chose the word to show how words themselves carry hidden meanings.

As for scale, the smaller you get, the simpler the components are. Maybe there's something "smaller" (after all, size is only one way of perceiving the physical world) than quarks and atomic particles, maybe there isn't. But as such, from those sub-atomic particles, everything else that is physical is made up from. As the scale increases with zooming out, two things happen:

1. The whole becomes more clear. The forest is seen from the trees, as I believe the saying goes.

2. The complexity of the structure increases. A shirt is more complex than a piece of string (usually, gimme a break, I'm talking about a short, straightened-out piece of string here, not a ten-mile tall ball of yarn) which is more complex than the molecular chains which are more complex than... you get the idea, don't you?

As for the purpose of evolution... I don't know, and I suppose I shouldn't know as I'm only restricted to the physical and mental realities. Just because we can't perceive other realities doesn't mean they don't exist, so Taco might be right about that, so maybe souls and God exist in some spiritual dimension. I'd really like to find out and to do so, I need to establish connections to the other dimensions. Maybe through combining the physical and mental realities? Or perhaps by honing them to their maximum potential?

I'm going to draw a picture one day, just to make it clearer. I have one mentally as a spatio-visual thinker.
Neutral Evil

Offline Tacolicious

  • Your Friendly Neighborhood Tacoman
  • *
  • Posts: 4898
Re: Concerning the mind and repentance
« Reply #14 on: July 15, 2007, 11:12:19 PM »
Well without getting into too much of a semantics debate as to what "repent" means, having been educated in the catholic school system I've always consider the process of repenting to be one of asking forgiveness from a higher power. Which I do stand opposed to because any higher "creator powers" gave you free will for a reason, probably not so that they could be bothered to fix things up for you all day.

As for scale, scale become irrelevant if the universe is truly infinite (I guess you could call that the corner stone of my faith). From the level of galaxies a shirt seems incredibly simple if it can even be noticed, sub-quantum particles (god only know what they are) probably seem quite simple from the level of the shirt, but the galactic could not exist without the sub-quantum and vise-versa. I've always thought the best shape to describe out universe (and that includes things above and below what can be seen in space-time, the true universe, whatever that might be) is a fractal torus, progressing infinitely into, out of and parallel to itself. In such a structure complexity or simplicity is merely in the eye of the beholder.
http://www.nationstates.net/wheresoever

"Reality is an illusion albeit a persistant one"
"Wisest is he who knows he is not wise"
"Nothing is fun when you have to do it, that's why you don't see a lot of old whores giggling over sex"


Delicious Comrade of the most Awesome Party