Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Let us make the whole region resound with the song of We Are The Happiest People in NationStates.

Poll

For or Against the Repeal?

For
2 (28.6%)
Against
5 (71.4%)

Total Members Voted: 7

Author Topic: Repeal "Oil Tanker Standards Act"  (Read 1492 times)

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Repeal "Oil Tanker Standards Act"
« on: June 23, 2014, 04:09:43 PM »
GENERAL ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION AT VOTE

Repeal "Oil Tanker Standards Act"
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
 

Category: Repeal

Resolution: GA#98

Proposed by: The Dourian Embassy

Description: WA General Assembly Resolution #98: Oil Tanker Standards Act (Category: Environmental; Industry Affected: All Businesses) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

Argument: The World Assembly,

Accepting that accidents involving oil tankers are an issue of importance to this body,

Regretting, however, that World Assembly Resolution #98, the "Oil Tanker Standards Act," is an incredibly flawed and problematic solution to those problems,

Noting that the World Assembly Oil Transportation Committee (WAOTC) is assigned the task of ensuring oil tankers are "kept up to meet requirements" without outlining exactly what those requirements are or how they even pertain to the resolution,

Further noting that the WAOTC is tasked with acquiring "new technology from member states already possessing it at the member state's consent" without defining what kind of technology it would acquire,

Understanding that requiring "non-proprietary double-hulled technology be made available to shipbuilders", without actually requiring the WAOTC to provide it, makes many of the WAOTC's assignments superfluous,

Further understanding that the requirement to "phase out" the use of single-hulled tankers is both costly and needless, as such tankers could find use hauling materials that are not as damaging to the environment,

Acknowledging that WA#98 places an unreasonable burden on nations with pre-existing fleets of single-hulled tankers while failing to provide any relief to this burden by funding this requirement,

Observing that the resolution imposes a requirement for a “proper” ventilation system without explaining what the purpose of such a system would be, and given that there are many ventilation systems which may have completely opposing purposes, this requirement is both ambiguous and unenforceable,

Astonished that the resolution urges nations to implement "other or better safety features aboard oil tankers other than what is specified here" despite the fact that "other safety features" may be inferior and used by nations to circumvent the requirements imposed on them previously in the resolution,

Believing that WA#98 is insufficient for the purpose of reducing spills, as there are many types of oil tanker designs that would not necessarily benefit from the technologies outlined here, nor would they see any benefit to the added costs these technology's integration would incur,

Recognizing that the sum of the flaws present in WA#98 both in format and in practical application have created a resolution that is nearly ineffective in achieving its stated goals,

Hereby repeals World Assembly Resolution #98, the "Oil Tanker Standards Act."

Co-Authored by Renaissancistic People.


Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Repeal "Oil Tanker Standards Act"
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2014, 06:11:36 PM »
Just because I don't trust Treize / Douria, NAY :P
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: Repeal "Oil Tanker Standards Act"
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2014, 09:43:37 PM »
Just because I don't trust Treize / Douria, NAY :P
ipsisverbis

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Re: Repeal "Oil Tanker Standards Act"
« Reply #3 on: June 26, 2014, 07:20:46 PM »
Voted AGAINST.