Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Citoyen priority warning: Not reporting counter-revolutionary activities is conspiracy to commit counter-revolution under the Anticivil Activities Act. Penalties go up to and include permanent Ecclesiastical explusion.

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 16

Author Topic: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia  (Read 17654 times)

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #120 on: November 14, 2007, 08:58:03 PM »
Quote from: Durnia on November 14, 2007, 06:06:04 PM
I could, yes.

Waiting...

and you do know its children in need night that evening in the UK...
Logged
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Durnia

  • Full of Imperial Mattyness
  • *
  • Posts: 756
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #121 on: November 14, 2007, 09:31:25 PM »
Quote from: Templarios on November 14, 2007, 08:58:03 PM
Quote from: Durnia on November 14, 2007, 06:06:04 PM
I could, yes.

Waiting...

and you do know its children in need night that evening in the UK...

Excuse me?
Logged
Nobody of importance.

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #122 on: November 14, 2007, 10:05:25 PM »
wait, whats going on?
Logged
Quote from: Solnath on May 01, 2008, 09:53:18 PM
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #123 on: November 14, 2007, 11:29:15 PM »
Long story, read and enjoy...
Logged
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #124 on: November 15, 2007, 01:40:15 AM »
too lazy to
Logged
Quote from: Solnath on May 01, 2008, 09:53:18 PM
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #125 on: November 15, 2007, 08:04:59 AM »
Your loss
Logged
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Allama

  • *
  • Posts: 6878
    • LibraryThing
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #126 on: November 15, 2007, 03:04:32 PM »
Quote from: Eluvatar on November 14, 2007, 08:35:29 PM
Preferably, allow each to interview you.

This would be a more than acceptable solution in my mind.  ^_^  I hereby request that both the prosecution and defense gain testimony from me directly via interview as suggested (if they both remain interested in my words), preferably via IRC.  I have spoken to both PoD Gunner and Templarios there in the past couple days, so you're likely both aware of my availability.  Work should die down sufficiently to allow me to join the channel fairly shortly, in fact, and I plan to remain there for a few hours.
Logged

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #127 on: November 15, 2007, 05:16:33 PM »
Quote from: Allama on November 15, 2007, 03:04:32 PM
Quote from: Eluvatar on November 14, 2007, 08:35:29 PM
Preferably, allow each to interview you.

This would be a more than acceptable solution in my mind.  ^_^  I hereby request that both the prosecution and defense gain testimony from me directly via interview as suggested (if they both remain interested in my words), preferably via IRC.  I have spoken to both PoD Gunner and Templarios there in the past couple days, so you're likely both aware of my availability.  Work should die down sufficiently to allow me to join the channel fairly shortly, in fact, and I plan to remain there for a few hours.

Thank you, some one will communicate with you soon.
Logged
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #128 on: November 15, 2007, 08:37:05 PM »
really though, why is govndia the bad guy here?
Logged
Quote from: Solnath on May 01, 2008, 09:53:18 PM
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #129 on: November 17, 2007, 10:53:38 AM »
Quote from: Barakarin on November 15, 2007, 08:37:05 PM
really though, why is govndia the bad guy here?

Because there is some 'evidence' that none of us have seen yet which says he did/is trying/is planning to do something against Taijitu...
Logged
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #130 on: November 17, 2007, 05:56:34 PM »
but gov seems like a nice guy....
Logged
Quote from: Solnath on May 01, 2008, 09:53:18 PM
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Templarios

  • *
  • Posts: 880
    • My Nation
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #131 on: November 17, 2007, 11:57:54 PM »
Some people dont think so
Logged
*Disclaimer*
In my above post, I did not intend to offend or upset anyone. If you were so, I deeply apologise.

Citzen since 08.10.07 ¦ Senator since 08.12.07 ¦ Second Speaker pro-Temp.

My Nations Stats  ¦ Standing Order - Views Only ¦ Knight's International Church Bank

Wiki Page

Offline Flemingovia

  • *
  • Posts: 669
  • Official Taijitu Minister of Apathy
Re: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #132 on: November 18, 2007, 05:19:34 PM »
BAsed on Govindia's latest post in the trial thread, it seems to me that this is a rather arse-about-face way of running a trial.

I would have thought that the court would schedule the trial, and the defendant would need to appoint counsel who could attend the trial at the time and the place set by the court, not say "I'm sorry, my defence team cannot be on IRC, so the trial will have to be on the forum...

It has been known for ages that the trial would be on IRC. Why has he appointed counsel who cannot attend the trial, unless the aim is to delay or derail?
Logged

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #133 on: November 18, 2007, 06:00:09 PM »
At this point I have to agree with Flem. It was known from the beginning that this would be an IRC trial and Gov had council that could make it on IRC, yet he chose to remove them from the defense team. Now he appoints council that can't. If I were on trial I believe one of the first questions I'd ask any possible defense team members would be "Can you be available and have the ability to make it on IRC?". That's just me though. Maybe I'm crazy for that. :shrug:


Edit: Said I instead of It in the second sentence. >_>
Logged


Offline Osamafune

  • *
  • Posts: 961
    • Myminicity
Re: Taijitu v. Govindia
« Reply #134 on: November 18, 2007, 08:15:38 PM »
Well for one thing, I volunteered to be his counsel. Do you see anyone else stepping up?

I believe the defense has a right to a forum trial. There's no law that says it has to be on irc.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11 ... 16
« previous next »