Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Citoyen reminder: Failure to participate in Daily Poll may result in being found guilty of enjoyment malcompliance.

Author Topic: Security of Succession  (Read 2840 times)

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Security of Succession
« Reply #15 on: July 04, 2007, 02:30:17 AM »
I'm not sure, I'd have to see what the Senate has to say about it. I for one might be inclined to do so.

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Moderator
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Security of Succession
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2007, 10:59:09 PM »
Alrighty then.

I think we as a Party can probably support this bill, and think you should probably go and propose it.

In the mean time, any further comments?
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline PoD Gunner

  • Praefectus praetorio.
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 1935
  • Egrota Egrota Egrota!!!
Re: Security of Succession
« Reply #17 on: July 07, 2007, 11:15:56 AM »
looks good to me. I do no know if and when the succession line will be an issue, but codifying it can be useful. As for the functionality of the vd / speaker assuming the del office if necessary, I support that, since the current system causes precious time to be lost and risks to make such a SDE look ridiculous in terms of continuity and length.
Co-Founder of Taijitu
Former Delegate of The Lexicon (by mistake), The Rejected Realms (par force) and Taijitu (elected)
*Home of GMT* / www.nationstates.net/nation=red_kagran