Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: The arteries of Taijitu run not with blood, but with kittens!

Author Topic: Proposal 1  (Read 2478 times)

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Proposal 1
« on: May 25, 2010, 01:14:41 AM »
Gulliver did most of the work, but we've come up with a proposed Constitution.

It's based off of the original in several fundamental ways:

  • Three classical US-style branches
  • The Executive is led by the Delegate
  • Ministries are appointed by the Delegate and do stuff
  • Citizens have to register with the government

But it's also radically different legislatively:

  • The Senate is small and elected rather than large and self-selecting.
  • The citizens get to vote on amendments and can petition for laws.
  • The Court administers elections.
  • The Executive's decision to reject a citizen can be overriden by the Senate
  • No Vice Delegate-- the Delegate selects a succession list of Ministers.
  • There is a Chief Justice in charge of the Court.
  • There is a separation of powers clause that applies to Cabinet, Court, and Senate.

I like this draft, but the Citizen Rights section still needs review.

Discuss
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2010, 01:32:27 AM »
As a final note, things in brackets are tentative ideas.

Offline St Oz

  • Sub-Commandante
  • Citizen-Delegate
  • *
  • Posts: 2158
  • www.something.com
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2010, 02:55:42 AM »
Quote
The Executive's decision to reject a citizen can be overriden by the Senate
Sounds bothersome

Quote
The Court administers elections.
This is good.

Quote
The Senate is small and elected rather than large and self-selecting.
I'm not sure why we did it that way in the first place.

Offline Towlie

  • *
  • Posts: 740
  • austri surget iterum
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2010, 07:54:17 AM »
Quote
The number of senators will be seven unless determined otherwise by law.
i think 9 would work the thirds better considering a third of seven ends up being 2 and a high likelihood of tie
Quote
The Executive's decision to reject a citizen can be overriden by the Senate
if this is kept it should go both ways
other that that a pretty good start
Sir, if you were my husband, I would poison your drink. --Lady Astor to Winston Churchill
Madam, if you were my wife, I would drink it. --His reply
When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading. --Henny Youngman

Offline HEM

  • *
  • Posts: 21
  • UCR Elitist
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2010, 10:19:56 AM »
A few things I noticed right away:

   
Quote
Any citizen who has held their citizenship continuously for at least four weeks and has registered on the official regional forums may run for the office of senator.

I've never liked the idea of preventing people from running until they have been in a region x ammount of time. It de facto creates a second class citizen and limits democracy. We should trust voters to know when a member isn't experienced enough or isn't suitable.

   
Quote
4. Vacancies occurring between elections will be filled by recounting the ballots of the last election as if the absent senator were not running.

I prefer by-elections, but that's just me ;)


Surpreme Chancellor of Europeia

Offline Myroria

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4345
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2010, 11:06:45 AM »
   
Quote
Any citizen who has held their citizenship continuously for at least four weeks and has registered on the official regional forums may run for the office of senator.

I've never liked the idea of preventing people from running until they have been in a region x ammount of time. It de facto creates a second class citizen and limits democracy. We should trust voters to know when a member isn't experienced enough or isn't suitable.

I agree. I think the kind of people who would be active enough to consider voting for a senator should be able to evaluate the voters carefully enough where newbieness isn't an issue.
"I assure you -- I will be quite content to be a mere mortal again, dedicated to my own amusements."

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2010, 01:06:48 PM »
I'd be fine with dropping those requirements. Gulliver?
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #7 on: May 25, 2010, 09:43:02 PM »
I would also be fine with dropping these requirements and making it simple citizen. Certainly it would simplify the language.

Quote
i think 9 would work the thirds better considering a third of seven ends up being 2 and a high likelihood of tie
Actually, a third of 7 is 2.3 repeating, which means quorum is 3. We did however have 9 originally, and I do prefer it as a bit of a cleaner number, but we were concerned that it would be difficult to find enough candidates to fill all the seats. Keep in mind, the size of the Senate can be changed by law under the current proposal.

Quote
I prefer by-elections, but that's just me Wink
Having a by election would kinda distort the proportional representation that we were hoping to achieve.

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2010, 03:04:15 PM »
Quote
The Executive's decision to reject a citizen can be overriden by the Senate
if this is kept it should go both ways
other that that a pretty good start

What do you mean?

Also I've updated the proposal.
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2010, 08:46:44 PM »
I believe he means if the Senate rejects a citizen it can be overturned by the Delegate.

Edit: Also if we make any rights to privacy about IRC, as owner of the esper one it shouldn't apply there. Just the new one.(but cant be used in court cases either as it is no longer the official channel) :P
« Last Edit: May 26, 2010, 08:49:48 PM by Teh Lulzy Delegate Ver. 2.0 »



Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2010, 09:21:56 PM »
Oh good point, the Criminal Codex should allow for channels with different rules...
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2010, 11:25:39 PM »
What about making a Vice Delegate position and having it like the way USA used to do elections? Where the second place becomes VD. You could still have the succession of ministers; just amend it with VD as second in line. Just a thought.



Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2010, 11:41:57 PM »
Let's have a poll.
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2010, 01:52:39 AM »
I really don't like the idea. I don't think it lends any functional gain and the chances are the second place person is likely to be the central opponent of the winner.

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: Proposal 1
« Reply #14 on: May 27, 2010, 01:57:03 AM »
Potentially provides a balance of ideas in the administration.