I would also be fine with dropping these requirements and making it simple citizen. Certainly it would simplify the language.
i think 9 would work the thirds better considering a third of seven ends up being 2 and a high likelihood of tie
Actually, a third of 7 is 2.3 repeating, which means quorum is 3. We did however have 9 originally, and I do prefer it as a bit of a cleaner number, but we were concerned that it would be difficult to find enough candidates to fill all the seats. Keep in mind, the size of the Senate can be changed by law under the current proposal.
I prefer by-elections, but that's just me Wink
Having a by election would kinda distort the proportional representation that we were hoping to achieve.