Daily Poll: The Three Laws

[bigbaldben]

VOTE DAMMIT.

[Khem]

I want my robot best friend already damnit!

[bigbaldben]

I want my robot best friend already damnit!

I sooooo want a Mr. Handy.

[Delfos]

I met one in the Underworld that was reprogrammed to defend zombies.

3rd law makes sense if they are androids where we see a "human" side. Otherwise 3rd law can rot in hell.

I liked that movie Ex-Machina. I'd totally be OK to lock that android for a period of time and evaluate, then free it to the real world. Couldn't we live with androids and let them have similar rights and similar punishments? If we're talking the advent of an AI android possibly kill a human, that's what you want to know. I think if AI is that advanced that could "break" that law, it's be as advanced to know ALL THE LAWS OF THE WORLD WITH GPS REFERENCE, and still break them all selectively or all together. Shouldn't then this android be regarded as a human breaking a crime or any AI that breaks laws is defective? You're pretty much saying any humans that break laws are defective...imo, but that's probably stretching it too much.

[Khem]

I met one in the Underworld that was reprogrammed to defend zombies.

3rd law makes sense if they are androids where we see a "human" side. Otherwise 3rd law can rot in hell.

I liked that movie Ex-Machina. I'd totally be OK to lock that android for a period of time and evaluate, then free it to the real world. Couldn't we live with androids and let them have similar rights and similar punishments? If we're talking the advent of an AI android possibly kill a human, that's what you want to know. I think if AI is that advanced that could "break" that law, it's be as advanced to know ALL THE LAWS OF THE WORLD WITH GPS REFERENCE, and still break them all selectively or all together. Shouldn't then this android be regarded as a human breaking a crime or any AI that breaks laws is defective? You're pretty much saying any humans that break laws are defective...imo, but that's probably stretching it too much.

Also loved that movie and agree that if we were to have true digital sapience that it would be a moral obligation to pass along the same rights to such entities as we cherish ourselves. Also the point of both robo and human criminals merely being defective units is in allot of ways true (when it comes to crimes which do harm to another) however may indeed be taking it too far when considering certain laws themselves may be broken in a moral sense (I would prefer my digital intelligence morally right than legally right).

[bigbaldben]

(I would prefer my digital intelligence morally right than legally right).

I would prefer my societal intelligence that way too.  But the question of who gets to decide the moral law can never be answered...

[Delfos]

(I would prefer my digital intelligence morally right than legally right).

I would prefer my societal intelligence that way too.  But the question of who gets to decide the moral law can never be answered...

Oh, that's easy, a dictatorship led by Khem himself. damn your morals.

[Khem]

(I would prefer my digital intelligence morally right than legally right).

I would prefer my societal intelligence that way too.  But the question of who gets to decide the moral law can never be answered...

Oh, that's easy, a dictatorship led by Khem himself. damn your morals.

See Delfos understands that I should be the robotic overlord