A Founderless Region?

[Stellaris]

JUst make sure they have NO special powers, we don't want this region to collapse due to stupidity like the Lex is doing.

[The G Rebellion]

This region is Founded to avoid that sort of thing completely. You were all tricked into believing you would have the chance to one day perhaps have power in The Lex, they showed you that was wrong.

[Morthia]

Well, seeing as Amy has basically given us TCM, I think that we can do something different. How about TCM being given to one person who pledges to intervene only where necessary?

[Eluvatar]

There are 7 charter members who share control of The Crazy Monkeymen. However I believe the constitution we are drafting specifically denies them the power to use its regional controls except when the Delegate is under impeachment proceedings (when they are expected to remove Delegate access to the regional controls).

[The G Rebellion]

Or, of course, in the event of a threat to the delegacy from an outside force. Both of these are extenuating circumstances and I don't see them coming around.

[Eluvatar]

That's true, if someone other than the elected delegate is near taking the delegate's seat, the Founders should be allowed to turn off Delegacy controls if the Delegate isn't around at that time or unwilling to eject the nation. Perhaps they should even be authorized to eject it themselves if the Delegate isn't around.

[Kanzac]

*Kanzac Ledear Steps forward and pulls out his Foution pen and signs it*
I Hereby Delcre Kanzac A MEBER OF TAIJITU!

[Of Crazed]

I personally dont like the term founder in this region.  Is it just me or does the word reak of Lexiconian Hypocrisy?  Dont get me wrong, I get we have a founder nation, but really that can be left to one or two people. (Elu and TCM come to mind).  As far as on the forums, the way every one has been preaching about how we are not like the Lexicon, I believe it is best to leave this term behind us.

[Romanar]

The terminology doesn't bother me, as long as they don't become tyrants.