But in all seriousness, I am like many other people in this thread very upset that they would do something like this within 24 hours of finalizing a draft of the treaty, and would also like to see the discussion tabled for at least a few weeks.
Tabling the discussion for a few weeks before voting seems the most prudent move to me as well. Though I'm all for forgiving repentant people after they fuck up (god knows I've needed forgiveness myself), they must prove that they can rise above their own mistake and learn from it, grow from it, and behave more responsibly to be considered a reliable ally.
That being said, I also don't want us to burn a bridge unnecessarily as happened over the Tomato Incident.
Let's note how they act going forward. I hope to see some earnest repentance once the facts settle in, which does not seem in abundance at this time. Violating a treaty's terms immediately before signing it is not acceptable, no matter how they attempt to excuse it. If the vote were held now I'd have to vote No on principle.