I would prefer to keep official offices to a minimum. We don't have enough threats to have a whole new section of government, but we do need some sort of protection. This proposal allows the Initiator to handle that, while being kept under the control of the electorate.
cool story, but I don't think I need to clarify further my concern, I do want the access to participation to be "effortless" as you say, the less things people need to do to participate the better.
I'm confused. Where has bureaucracy been added anywhere in this legislation?
The definition of Bureaucracy is:
a system of government in which most of the important decisions are made by state officials rather than by elected representatives
We are a direct system of governance, the Citizen-Initiator is a citizen, they are bound by the will of the people directly as the Ecclesia are the people. There cannot be bureaucracy in this system of governance.
We can play with words all day if you want. You're giving power to a figure, whether or not he has a Citizen prefix, he has the power to allow people or not to participate in Ecclesia. This proposal, imo, adds fairly organized collection of information, which is fine, but as I said before, I'd rather people not have any restrictions accessing Ecclesia and that someone else to have the trouble finding out if someone is ok or not, because that already happens, information is already being exchanged in the NS game either way, we already have collective information, as I said, Regional Security already happens in an ad hoc small scale. We wouldn't be any more safe bc there's a fact-checking system to see if someone is lying or we doubt the applicant is lying. In other words, if you can't be
Stasi, don't pretend you can, this system adds no real security, it's a false statement of security, the same way the oath is.
Oh, beware of the oath breakers.
