oh crap, I said so much on the other topic that I should have said here.
I value this ad hoc spirit therefore I'd suggest subtle changes, transfer more work to voluntary Ecclesia people, let us decide to do things.
Ecclesia needs to reclaim power, re-design the "offices", we don't need half the bills that grant autonomy to work groups that don't work and aren't really autonomous, we need to decide ourselves what to do, let people be in the center of the discussion, planning and decisions, that way everyone feels they have participated.
I like the Citizen-Manager if it take up the most practical functions of C-L and C-I, whatever Ecclesia can do themselves we can all do our part then removing the C-I functions to the Ecclesia.
tbh I don't see why Ecclesia couldn't take up the whole of the decision making, how hard is to vote on stuff? Some things don't need to be endlessly discussed, yes, we should define those things and either the Citizen-Delegate or some sort of elected commission could then put up votes to whatever decision needs to be done without passing through a whole discussion about why what or how. But, What is the rush? We all like to have everything discussed by everyone, everyone having equal chance to discuss and vote, but it never happens, it will never happen, but because this can't be perfect you don't need to have someone with the power to make decisions, for instance for foreign policy, on the spot. There's no need, the whole game is sluggish already, why do you need to reply immediately? Lets all be sluggish and have a sluggish system where the most people can participate, or at least that everyone have the chance to participate.
