There is no two irreconcilable groups entrenched against each other. I for one have no problem with change, but I will not tear down what we have before there is a clearly formulated alternative, and I do not think I am alone in this.
There are two groups, and there are moderates, one group wants to tear the whole thing down and start over fresh(I don't know why its an issue this time, in the past its generally how we've done things, we never get much done while rewriting things anyway there's no need to keep it around if it isn't going to be used) the other group doesn't seem to want change, the moderates are for a convention(and so are the people who want to tear it down, this whole thing was to show that there are a majority of people that are against it). But, FriarTuck in IRC, through random chance chose to tear it down and start over again.
1[22:51] <@OT> you know what
01[22:52] <@OT> here, I will roll one d20, having assigned random numbers to either repeal or consensus
01[22:53] <@OT> repeal 2-20 even consensus 1-19 odd
01[22:53] <@OT> .roll 1d20
13[22:53] <@FriarTuck> OT: You rolled 10
03[22:53] * Wast changes topic to 'taijitu.org | Welcome to Taijitu, the BESTEST region for meat styluses | Quote of the Day: <@Allama> Sausages are incredibly versatile apparently | <OT> repeal 2-20 even consensus 1-19 odd | FriarTuck: OT: You rolled 10 | don't share logs'
[22:54] <@Wast> I HAVE RECORDED THE RESULT
As was shown in this vote, its fairly evenly split(12 for, 10 against, 2 abstentions) but still that shows a lot of people aren't happy.