First of all, I'm letting you know this is the last time I plan on replying to you.
As a Tory (not a Conservative, a Tory, there's a world of difference), I would like to think I'm tolerant of the opinions of others. But you, I'm sorry, you're just blind to the views of others, you let the EU and Euronews tell you what to think. I'm not going to bother myself with someone who took me simply posting the basics of the Jewish faith as an excuse to attack the State of Israel.
I've had it with your closeted anti-Semetism, your blatant anti-Americanism (anyone who knows me will tell you I don't love my southern neighbour, far from it), your blind spouting of Marxisms (G-China, for example, is a socialist I can respect because he doesn't argue his point of view like a 12 year old), and your all-around attitude of self-superiority. I'm responding here, to defend my opinions on the matter, then I'm washing my hands of you. Go ahead and believe that capitalism is evil, Jews cause all of the world's wars, and that the United States is the "Great Satan."
You're what, fourteen? Take a chill-pill, and calm down. You're letting yourself get caught up in a whirlwind of Eurocentral fanaticism.
but you're an idiot if you think they're more likely to nuke someone then Iran is.
I would say you're an idiot if you think I was talking about n00kz.
Well considering the name of topic is "Nuclear Iran" I would think "n00kz" would be what we were discussing. If you were thinking of something else, perhaps a change in the thread's title is in order.
Yes but USA is being led by a President that, for what i understand , no one wants, not even non-Americans. So... you loose your point there, Mr.
First off, I'm by no means a Bush fan. I think both the USA and the American Republican Party can do much better.
Still, compared to Ahmadinejad, he's a beacon of enlightenment. Between Bush and Ahmadinejad, which one has made the destruction of an entire nation (and in a lesser sense an entire race) official government policy? You always conveniently seem to forget that fact....
I did talk with an Iranian that says he doesn't support Mr. A (not Anderson). He says he would rather the last regime, he brands the flag with the shiny lion if you know what i mean.
*Slaps head. Dude, have you not yet figured out I'm a flag nut? I study Vexillology, of course I know what flag you're talking about. Here's a free tip, cut out the condescending BS. It'll go a long way to getting you respected in the field of intelligent discussion.
As for your Iranian friend, what does that say? A guy who's from Iran would prefer the past regime to the fanatical Islamic regime in power today. While you preach from an ivory tower someone on the ground level is telling you you're wrong.
What i can say about the subject, Ahmadinejad (i gotta copy that name every time) is the best thing they have at the moment, i mean, his government isn't as bold as Mr.A is, and if you hear his Foreign Affairs Minister or other departments, specially the Ambassadors, you will see what I'm talking about, there's competence behind all the fanaticism. And they don't like to be linked directly to the fanatics. There's subtle links but even USA has (worse) subtle links.
If Ahmadinejad is the best Iran can do at the moment, then maybe the US should ditch Iraq and invade Iran. Because even the worst occupation plan Bush and co. can put together is a hell of a lot better then a government who has advocated the destruction of an other sovereign state, and who seems to be itching to go to war for no good reason. Ahmadinejad got lucky that Tony Blair had no balls. Any British PM with a shred of national pride would have gone in and kicked his ass to Russia and back for pulling the stunt he did.
Simply put, there's no competence behind the Iranian government's fanaticism, and don't kid yourself, they are fanatics. Any government that advocates the destruction of a sovereign nation isn't functioning on all cylinders.
Given that it's Israel, I wouldn't expect you to care, but what if Spain made the destruction of Portugal official government policy? Just imagine you weren't aloof from all of it for a moment.
Oh i would dare to say the current Iranian government is more competent than the current United States of America government: History proves it.
While reading what I'm about to post, keep in mind my country has spent the majority of its existence in fear of an American invasion. Also, I scored perfect on a university level American history course in grade 10, so I know my American history.
You're nuts. The Iranian government more competent then the American one? Lets take Ahmadinejad and Bush out of the picture, and look at the bigger picture.
What historical evidence do you have to support your ludicrous claim that the Iranian government is more competent then the American gov? I know destroying Israel appeals to you, but come on, look at the big picture.
The Iranian government is run by fanatical religious nut-jobs who use their faith as an excuse to oppress others.
This oppression and the single-stream of thought it protects have stifled progress and turned what should be a wealthy nation due to oil reserves into a third world arm pit. When the government oppresses all but one form of thought, as it has in Iran, innovation and progress come to a screeching halt. When half of your population (at least) is forbidden to education, what hope to you have as a nation?
Hell, I would have thought you, a socialist Eurocentralist, would be critical of Iran for their reactionary politics, specifically the rigid enforcement of a Theocratic government.
The American government, on the other hand, despite its (many) flaws, has embraced freedom of religion, thought, and conscience. The United States is the world's lone superpower. We all know that. But think for a moment, why is that? It's because the American government, by upholding freedom of religion, thought, and conscience, has allowed innovation to not only survive but flourish. This is a nation that put a man on the moon for crying out loud. Think about that for a moment. The moon. We take that achievement for granted, but just think about it, and you realize how amazing an accomplishment that was. Now think. Would the current government of Iran allow for the scientific innovation needed to put a man on the moon to exist? No. Intellectuals are the natural enemy of a fanatical regime. Why? Because they're smart enough to see what's really going on. Hence any type of serious intellectual development in Iran is snuffed out.
You brought up history. Ok, lets look at history and where each nation's history has lead.
Iran-third world nation ruled by a fanatical Theocracy.
United States-the world's loan super power, the first true republic since Rome, allowed the thought of "All men are created equal" to grow in the western world. More scientific and cultural innovations then any other nation.
Now which government is more competent?
Again, you're 14. Believe it or not, you don't know everything. Take a breather, mature a little, and I'll get back to you.
