raw communism isn't a form of government, if that's why it's not there, than Anarchy shouldn't be either. My answer is not what is the government i think is more efficient or the most fancy, but the best form of government as a leadership form. Chosen Republic (Doesn't have to be democratic, but what the heck, plus what is now democratic isn't the true form of the word, democracy is an anti-authoritarian form, almost left-ish, but most of the democratic movements are right-ish.)
Republic has someone in power, actually more than one, that's what makes me feel good about it, there's not 1 asshole up there, there's more than one, giving him more than 1 points of view, and all should be governed by what people wants. Anything that is ran by 1 man only turns out authoritarian, basics for dictatorship. Any anti-dictatorship system is welcome in my opinion. This excludes most of the forms of government there are written on the choices.
Theocratic is a good one, normally theocratic systems are ruled by spiritual leaders, that tends to be a dictatorship because either you follow the spirit the spiritual leader orders you, or you get decapitated or something. But it's a good system nevertheless, giving you an example, i can listen to Morocco radio when i go to south Portugal, they always say thank you to each other, they are always very polite. People in this countries are always very polite because of the religion. So theocratic systems make the people, by force, follow moral guidance, and that's nice. Except you can't follow your own convictions, but there can be a miracle that a theocratic system may not be authoritarian.
Anyway, Republic/democracy systems are as good as quoting Winston Churchill
Where the King can avoid all the squabbling of a bureaucracy/democracy
so the king has all the power, but doesn't have all the power? people are not free to follow anything but the King, but they can follow everything they want?
Poll