Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Let us make the whole region resound with the song of We Are The Happiest People in NationStates.

Author Topic: 'Just War'  (Read 10049 times)

Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #75 on: June 01, 2007, 07:11:48 PM »
i don't hate Bush, i just don't like him. Or more likely, quoting Hugo Chavez, he's the devil. lol

Offline LLANYDERN

  • *
  • Posts: 413
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #76 on: June 01, 2007, 08:27:42 PM »
wars can be just to give an example the republican fight against Franco during the Spanish civil war was a just fight (admittedly they cocked it up so badly (dam those pesky Stalinists)).  World War Two was also a just fight to a certain point, its effect was good (end of Hitler and co) but the reasons for getting into it not so good (now if we'd gone in when they re-occupied the rhine land or took over austria or when they did chekislovakia  (if you haven't noticed I can't spell worth a dam) then we'd have had a legal excuse to go and crush his lot). 

most wars have definitely not been just fights, WWI, Kosovo, Iraq, Malaysia, Vietnam, Chechnya, Angola, Grenada, the iraq-iran war, the yugoslavian civil war, somalia, abysinia, afganistan (however many times its been now), etc, etc.


A just war is one that is fought for reasons other then the fact it benefits the rulers of the nations involved (obviously these have to be good reasons i.e. them being fascists or shelling over your border unprovoked something like that, rather then they have a resource you want or are doing something that disadvantages your nation economically)

The current Iraq war is a farce, Iraq had nothing to do with september the 11th attack and was a highly secular country (in fact osama bin ladin begged the US to let his forces attack saddam during the first gulf war) they didn't have WMD's (all the ones we had sold to them had gone off by this point and they wern't able to build their own) and their military had been screwed by the sanctions.  The war was about oil (not for supply to the US directly but it still benefits those in control there) and now foreign oil companies are looting the oil wealth of Iraq (contracts now being agreed give profits of 60-99% compared to the normal level of 15%).  Anyone who says that Iraq is about humanitarian intervention is either an ill informed idiot or a liar, sanctions and the actions of the occupying forces have killed many more Iraqis then sadam ever could have.  Anyone who says that its to stop the Kurds or marsh arabs from being attacked is also ill informed or a liar as what sadam has done to them Turkey is doing just as bad over the border to the Kurds and the Armenians.  To say its to stop sectarian violance why is it that it is mainly forces backed by the occupying forces that commit these acts and when local people form organisations to protect themselves they get attacked by coalition forces, there has even been direct evidence that coalition forces are directly fanning the flames of religious hatred (a number of british special forces soldiers wearing the garb of members of the mehdi army were arrested for possesing bomb making equipment by Iraqi police, after the first attempt to release them was prevented by the local inhabitants the army returned later that night and drove an IFV through the police station killing several police officers) also it must be noted that the mehdi army's leader muctader al sader (might have spelt that wrong I can't remember how its spelt so i've done in phenetically) has called for unity between the resistance to throw the occupying forces out to make Iraq a place for Iraqi's regardless of religion and that the mehdi army is now working with other resistance groups to drive out al quaida and the US (its ironic that the reason for this is the fact that the US locked up some high ups in various resistance groups together regardless of religion and so promoted this newfound unity).

In afganistan now people are flocking to the taliban on the grounds that they are standing up to the nato forces unlike almost all other groups in afganistan.

I hate Bush but I hate Kerry, Clinton and all the others, the democrats are just as bad as the republicans (as one person put it to me recently both of them are screwing us up the ass the only difference is the democrats use lube).
I don't have anger issues I just prefer to solve my problems with violence!

Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #77 on: June 01, 2007, 08:41:22 PM »
I actually like Clinton (the man), i think he was one of the best presidents USA ever had. Great that he didn't gave up and is now present in alot of important debates.

I think you should try O'Bama or how the hell he is called. He seems promising.

Offline LLANYDERN

  • *
  • Posts: 413
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #78 on: June 01, 2007, 08:52:44 PM »
Well I'm a British socialist so even Nader seems at best center right to me.  The democrats are about the position of the mainstream right wing party in Britain (and thats the left of the democrats). Also the democrats as a whole voted to support the war unconditionally (admittedly not most of their leadership candidates their not that stupid).

The best president of America that I know of is nixon but even he not that much.
I don't have anger issues I just prefer to solve my problems with violence!

Offline Solnath

  • Solus Victor
  • *
  • Posts: 5920
  • Pamfu desu!
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #79 on: June 01, 2007, 09:09:25 PM »
At least Clinton was honest.
Neutral Evil

Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #80 on: June 01, 2007, 09:19:08 PM »
Not just honest, great president. NATO was used for it's actual propose instead of just an American accessory of war. (this just to be in-topic)

Offline LLANYDERN

  • *
  • Posts: 413
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #81 on: June 01, 2007, 09:32:06 PM »
what that disaster in Kosovo?

The one where we stood back and bombed the hell out of everyone causing a teetering government widely despised to bounce back.

The one where we littered the area with huge amounts of depleted nuclear materials which we knew caused genetic defects and radiation poisoning in service men/woman and civilians in the area used on.

The one where with our precision weapons we managed to blow up the Chinese embassy.

The one where if it hadn't been for a British officer refusing his orders NATO forces would have engaged those of the Russian Federation and possibly caused war between the two powers armed with enough nuclear weapons to end all human life on this planet.

The one where there is still all these years later huge amounts of ethnic tensions which have if anything been only exacerbated by foreign involvement.

Yeah that was a great success

Add this to his huge funding for the idiotic war on drugs, faith based initiatives, cutting funding to those organizations which promote the use of condoms in areas of Africa where AIDS is a major problem, supporting death squads in various countries around the world, helping dictators who were friendly to the US, kowtowing to big business, continuing the bombing of Iraq while supporting sanctions that killed millions of Iraqi civilians......

Yeah great guy
I don't have anger issues I just prefer to solve my problems with violence!

Offline Solnath

  • Solus Victor
  • *
  • Posts: 5920
  • Pamfu desu!
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #82 on: June 01, 2007, 09:44:01 PM »
Honest about being full of s***!  ;D
Neutral Evil

Offline LLANYDERN

  • *
  • Posts: 413
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #83 on: June 01, 2007, 09:49:59 PM »
I don't care what he does with cigars and interns its the rest that bothers me.
I don't have anger issues I just prefer to solve my problems with violence!

Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #84 on: June 01, 2007, 10:08:12 PM »
as i pointed to be in-topic, NATO was used to it's reason. Bombings were claimed as accidents. Not quite the same as in Afghanistan where they bomb entire villages with people in.

Offline LLANYDERN

  • *
  • Posts: 413
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #85 on: June 01, 2007, 10:20:13 PM »
its quite similar its just that in afganistan you really can't say you were bombing tanks or whatever as there arn't any.

Also its less of a darling of the middle class left
I don't have anger issues I just prefer to solve my problems with violence!

Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #86 on: June 01, 2007, 10:41:35 PM »
if there's no tanks, why bombing at all?

Offline LLANYDERN

  • *
  • Posts: 413
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #87 on: June 01, 2007, 10:51:14 PM »
yes what I'm saying is that during serbia the bombing was just as destructive of civilians if not more so, however in serbia they could say oh its a tragic accident we were aiming at the tanks and missed regardless of the truth and as the war was "a good war" people ignored it, in Afganistan its just more obvious what they are doing.

Prior to Britain being kicked out of Iraq it was decided that occupation with ground forces was too costly in manpower, so they came up with the concept of rule by aireal bombardment which meant that if you did anything the British didn't like we bombed you, late with taxes bombed, looked funny at a British official bombed, attacked a oil refinery bombed, talked out against British rule bombed, tried to unionize bombed
I don't have anger issues I just prefer to solve my problems with violence!

Offline Khablan

  • *
  • Posts: 1802
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #88 on: June 01, 2007, 11:52:29 PM »
Clinton was honest?  When?  I must have missed that day.  The man exuded falseness through every pore.  And I mean right from campaigning for the election.  Does anyone remember how hard they pushed the Kennedy similarities?  Good Lord, they even had Hillary bake cookies and wear a headband to make her look the part of Jackie.  They moved Kennedy's old desk back into the Oval Office so they could pose Clinton with it and use that as one more thing to compare the two.  How obvious can manipulation be?  Was it any surprise that Hillary ditched those headbands the minute her husband was elected?  Clinton's just a politician like every other.  He made good connections and learned how to walk the walk and talk the talk.

Reagan was popular too.  The man wasn't even a president in any real sense other than the fact that he was elected to the office.  His entire purpose was to be the "face" for the administration who really ran the show.  How anyone actually bought into the "trickle-down theory" is beyond me.  I was astounded when he was re-elected.

Kennedy was good.  Carter was good but was thwarted on all domestic issues and so concentrated his efforts mainly on the international, and people have somehow forgotten all the good he did - they only remember what he wasn't able to do.  Out of the presidents we've had since I was born, those were the ONLY two I'd say were any good at all.

And people wonder why the number of voters here have declined so much.  Because either we vote for one of two very sucky candidates, or we throw our vote away.  Sure, we can write in a candidate, or vote no to all the above, but one of the two are still going to win and we know it.  So to many people, it isn't even worth getting up off the sofa.
For all the news, check out our Community Office!

Got questions?  We got answers!  Come see our Information Section!

Official welcome wagon of Taijitu, Co-Minister of Community and Recruitment. Taijitu's ambassador to TWP, Madre Califidrix of the Order of Gryphons. 

Also unofficial forum mom - provider of various sources of solace for the soul, including but not limited to cookies, hugs, and hot cocoa.


Offline Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: 'Just War'
« Reply #89 on: June 02, 2007, 12:02:49 AM »
And that is wrong, because you can let the worse one win. That's why when there's multiple candidates and there's a 2nd turn of 2 of them, all left supports the left candidate and all right supports the right one. I guess what USA needs is an election like in France. (However I'm not sure it's that effective when people that are supposed to be affected by social welfare voted for right wing, probably eluded)

Politicians can lie, but some lie too much ^^