Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Long live the Glorious Revolution!

Author Topic: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)  (Read 3467 times)

Offline B9 perspective

  • Reincarnate Russian Potato Farmer Extraordinaire
  • *
  • Posts: 469
  • Easy, Baby..........
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #15 on: January 31, 2008, 07:10:12 AM »
What are your feelings about cross-over in roles; ie.Members of the Executive, serving in the Judiciary, or in more than one role in the Executive? How do you feel about Ministerial roles being defined or elaborated-in such a way that areas like the Zocalo might be governed by a Minister rather than an Administrator?
What ideas do you have for jump starting the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, if any?
Tolerance, generosity, patience, openmindedness, and anything having to do with chord progressions....

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #16 on: January 31, 2008, 11:01:08 AM »
     Thanks for the question!
 
     The my feelings on the matter are mixed, idealism vs. practicality and the reality of our online environs. The idea of a member of the executive, say a cabinet member or deputy, serving in the judiciary bothers some. I see their point, and to some extent I agree with it. The fear is that a Delegate will "pack the courts" to push forth their own agenda, thus maginalising the Senate.

     However, the reality of the situation, at least in my opinion, is that there are only so many qualified individuals to go around. Choosing justices is difficult for this reason. If, say, you've got 6 people in mind for cabinet roles, and need or want to install 2 justices, you've got to find 8 people who meet the following requirements.

1) Trustworthy
2) Active on the forum (and hopefully, IRC as well)
3) Familiar with the laws of Taijitu (this requirement more important in the case of justices, for say, an MoC, that's really not all that crucial)
4) Either are experienced in the roles you have them in mind for, or, have shown themselves to be a "quick study". Also, not everyone is suited for every job. I'd never appoint an MoC who didn't post much in the General area. In an MoD, I look for a rigid steadfastness and if not experience, then at least a very sound understanding of NS military strategy. A lot of thought goes into it.

     Due to this, a Delegate may find themselves with an available talent pool. I've ran into this problem myself before (though, in my last term in delegate, I was immensely fortunate in this respect, and had the most kick ass cabinet possible in this game!)

     So, in theory, I think a delegate should *try* to have at one justice who is not a member of the executive branch. Though, the people should not be alarmed if it does not always play out that way, and know that other, non malevolent forces were probably at work.

 

     With regard to FA, I do actualy have a plan. We need to reach out. I've said that before, and we've done that before, but this time I feel we have a more urgent sense of purpose.In september, the domain and hosting for NS as a whole comes up for renewal, and it's future is by no means certain. I want Taijitu to take the forefront in going to other regions, large and small, defender and raider, and forumlating ways to make sure NS does not die.

     There is currently a "conference" underway, with representatives from many regions participating. The problem with it is that it's so broad in it's scope, that nothing is coming of it save for an exersize in semantics. It's long on ideas, and short on consensus.

     What I would assemble would be much different, focusing exclusively on the issue mentioned above, contacting Max Barry, and doing all we can as players to resolve any issues he may have with the game continuing. We can save the more abstract concerns about game mechanics and what not for later.

     This would in some ways be an OOC outing, of course, due to it's nature, but the in game FA aspect cannot be over looked. In approaching these regions, talking to them, and building a coalition, we will forge very real relationships with our would be partners, using our common ground to reach new understandings about each other.

   I know that this is only January, and September may as well be a universe away for many. But if we're going to do something, best to do it sooner, then later. It could very well take that long to make sure everything will pan out in an acceptable manner.


Offline Myroria

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4345
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #17 on: February 01, 2008, 02:25:00 AM »
Do you still plan to make me Minister of Taijituan Truth and give the people all the latest...hrm, facts?
"I assure you -- I will be quite content to be a mere mortal again, dedicated to my own amusements."

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2008, 03:17:52 AM »
 I am now, as always, committed to the highest standards of truthiness and balldacity.


Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2008, 06:01:12 PM »
what do i get to do?
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2008, 10:51:48 PM »
Um, not sure, I'd have to find out more about what you're strengths and weaknesses are. But, I know we'll need all of the talented people we've got. So i'm sure we can put you to very good use!


Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #21 on: February 02, 2008, 01:36:16 PM »
i can Spam
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Durnia

  • Full of Imperial Mattyness
  • *
  • Posts: 756
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #22 on: February 02, 2008, 09:59:14 PM »
What do you think of the recent purge/mass ejections by Ivan? Good or bad for the game? As a player, what do you think of him and what he has done?
Nobody of importance.

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #23 on: February 06, 2008, 07:03:52 PM »
     There was a time when such an action would have enraged me. But, to be honest, given the current state of the game, I think we could use more dramatic actions. Something to make people talk, and have a reason to play this game other than just bullshitting with their friends (which, is great, but you can do that on any forum, you don't need NS for that)

     Though I've often disagreed with Ivan, he's always been a captivating personality, and definately someone who adds something to the game. He, like IP, is an asshole, but, we need assholes. They serve a purpose, because without them, all we've got is WWPN. NS needs it's heroes and it's villains. it seems now that everyone is trying to wear the white hats and all that's happening is people sitting 'round with our thumbs up our collective ass.


Offline Myroria

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4345
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #24 on: February 07, 2008, 02:11:09 AM »
What do you plan to do to people who just fucking piss me off?

I hope it involves a nine iron.
"I assure you -- I will be quite content to be a mere mortal again, dedicated to my own amusements."

Offline Sovereign Dixie

  • I regret nothing!
  • *
  • Posts: 1630
  • Fuck the revolution.
Re: ZOMG!!!! SD 4 Deleg8 V 3.0!!!!11 (Sovereign Dixie's Campaign Thread)
« Reply #25 on: February 07, 2008, 03:34:35 AM »
Worse, it involves Rosie O; Donnell