Can you stop with the ridiculous photos.
The Senate failed as a body. It didn't do anything. We had to enact the emergency government plan and St Oz became the Delegate. We could hold as many elections as you want, or cling to whatever provision of the constitution you wanted.
The Senate may confirm all treaties negotiated by the Delegate by a two-thirds majority vote. ALSO
The Delegate may negotiate treaties with foreign powers to be approved or rejected by the Senate. - yet he took the liberty of breaking treaties by himself. It was not the Senate who failed
We even publicly denounced his power trip and posted our dissatisfaction. Oz failed.
The Senate could have voted to remove St Oz as Delegate if he was that bad. You did not do so.
Well we couldn't, you'd need a proper referendum and the CJ was not available.
If the Senate impeaches the Delegate, a referendum on removing the Delegate will be held.
If the referendum succeeds, the Delegate will be removed from office. Anyway, creating a vacancy doesn't solve problems and just because he wasn't removed from his elected executive mandate doesn't give him the right to do anything he wants. This isn't a test the limit game. We did search for a solution and it's obvious, we'd either change the regime or have new elections, I guess you don't pay much attention because your interests lie elsewhere.
St Oz did what he had to do and was the steward of the region. The constitutional government was not functioning. In the future, when the region is active and recruitment is working that will not be an issue. But we should not dissolve into this ridiculous council as an absolute authority on matters both executive and legislative. No thank you. I do not want Taijitu to turn into a legislative police state, where whoever can hold a majority in the Senate can do whatever they like and the Delegate must bend over and take it.
Steward? I think you have the wrong Constitution, the WAD already has to bend over Senate because that's what democracy is. TBH the Council idea doesn't change much to what is now, it just removes a middle man that thinks he's the top of the world when he's not. The Senate may enact whatever they want,
already, and the only thing the Delegate can do is veto which may,
already, be overpassed by Senate, therefore, the Senate already has all those powers. So what you're against is the democratic powers of the Senate, you want the Delegate or "King Regent" or "Steward" as you may have called it, more powers and no democratic interference.
The Senate is an open body. It could have and should have scrutinized the Delegate for his actions, but it didn't. The Senate in the past also took some direction over government departments that were not being managed. Neither of you did that.
St Oz made a statement a few months back where he placed External Affairs in the hands of the Senate. If the actions committed by Oz in that field were so bad, why did the Senate not act?
We did act, we did scrutinize, we were against it, the Delegate cannot force executive powers over the Senate and the Senate has no procedure for External Affairs, all we may or may not do is debate and approve or disapprove External Affairs treaties/negotiations by a minister/WAD.
Also, censorship isn't in the constitution yet. Ridiculous pictures show ridiculous times.
Poll