Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: Citoyen priority warning: Not reporting counter-revolutionary activities is conspiracy to commit counter-revolution under the Anticivil Activities Act. Penalties go up to and include permanent Ecclesiastical explusion.

Author Topic: Movement for the removal of the resource system  (Read 5704 times)

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #30 on: February 14, 2007, 05:16:39 PM »
landlocked nations?

I would like salt added as a resource.


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Myroria

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 4345
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #31 on: February 14, 2007, 05:21:50 PM »
They have rivers still.
"I assure you -- I will be quite content to be a mere mortal again, dedicated to my own amusements."

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #32 on: February 14, 2007, 05:23:52 PM »
If we get rid of water, we must get rid of food.  The assumption behind getting rid of water is that it's a resource that everybody has.  Well, it isn't.  The comparison is made to air, but everybody has air; nowhere on a sufficiently large planet is there a lack of atmosphere.  Water is scarce and discrete, and should be counted.

Besides, that eliminates the concept of "desert," and ignores the fact that many countries actually do import water.  It's perfectly fine with me if you don't want to include water as a resource; it's not manditory.  Only be prepared to trade for it.

And I agree with Prag about sugar, as I always have.

All true points.  Water should be kept.  Nevermind my previous thought.

So we changing this from its removal to its expansion?
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #33 on: February 14, 2007, 05:26:35 PM »
apparantly.

In regards to Myroria's comments...

Rivers might be polluted.  Nations might not have the technology to distill the water out of seawater (you need plastic or glass, as well as some sort of fuel for your heat source)  I'm sure there are other examples that aren't coming to me...

Oh, and distillation needs to happen on a large scale, not the laboratory distilation that I was envisioning.  This means you would need suction pumps, which require electric power, steel for a pipeline, concrete to build the facility itself, and a distribution system.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2007, 05:39:59 PM by Gallipoli-China »


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Daimiaen

  • *
  • Posts: 820
  • Daimien is always right...except when he's wrong..
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #34 on: February 14, 2007, 06:41:24 PM »
Move sugar out of grains....

Go for a vote on more or same resources....

If there is a consensus for more resources per nation add more resources to the list.....including salt....

If there is a consensus for the same resources remove water from the list......

does that cover it???
Nothing real can be threatened nothing unreal exists....

Political compass....
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #35 on: February 14, 2007, 06:56:14 PM »
It is reasonable to include salt as a resource if we are keeping water.
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Zimmerwald

  • *
  • Posts: 2414
  • Demon Barber of Taijitu
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #36 on: February 14, 2007, 07:33:05 PM »
zinc and nickel should be added as resources as well, and we forgot a BIG one: natural rubber.


ProP Spokesperson

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #37 on: February 14, 2007, 08:15:50 PM »
Natural rubber as a raw resource?

Last I checked natural rubber comes from trees, aka lumber.
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Gulliver

  • Data Dog
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 5284
  • Forsooth, do you grok my jive, me hearties?
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #38 on: February 14, 2007, 09:32:19 PM »
No, they are worlds apart! Lumber can come from just about any old tree. Rubber on the other hand specifically needs the rubber tree.

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #39 on: February 14, 2007, 10:31:46 PM »
Whoa, sorry.  Dont get your panties in a bunch there Pragmia.  I'll add it later on, but with the abundance of oil in Taijitu I doubt it'll make any difference.

Natural Rubber
Salt
Nickel
Zinc

Got it.  All common.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2007, 11:11:09 PM by Bustos »
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Daimiaen

  • *
  • Posts: 820
  • Daimien is always right...except when he's wrong..
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #40 on: February 19, 2007, 06:47:38 PM »
Also Furs....as a rare....
being as there are hundreds of thousands of okapi and jaguar and ocelot and such in Daimiaena....
Nothing real can be threatened nothing unreal exists....

Political compass....
Economic Left/Right: -5.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.08

Offline Bustos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6041
  • Spam Deity
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #41 on: February 19, 2007, 10:26:14 PM »
Furs will be added as a rare under Other.
Allied States of Bustos (WIP)


Brought to you by Bustos

Offline Feniexia

  • *
  • Posts: 1459
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #42 on: February 19, 2007, 10:43:00 PM »
Yes. I´d say, 15 common ressources, and three rares....we need more rares. Besides, the colony rules are...um...crap. A colony should be treated as own nation in terms of the ressource system, although the obtaining of ressources might be very low on the beginning phases....

Offline Annabe

  • *
  • Posts: 64
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #43 on: February 21, 2007, 04:13:04 AM »
I had considered that, but again, as many poeple are quick to remind anyone, this isnt earth.  If a bunch of nations want to repeatedly pick oil as their rare, then that means on Taijitu oil is more plentiful.
:taijitu:

I am still waiting on a nation to pick cotton.      :D

I did the same as you did GC, I looked up various equatorial nations and made my selections from here.

I picked cotton...

Offline Ranholn

  • Recycle or I'll Fucking Kill You
  • *
  • Posts: 1075
  • Bye Ya'll
Re: Movement for the removal of the resource system
« Reply #44 on: February 22, 2007, 06:59:41 PM »
rubber plants, but adding some more chemicals for pharmisuticals, and such. people keep saying they will make things if they use supliments but dont have anything to make them
PSR has left the region
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EiPqWy8ibA4

 IT LIVES ON FOREVER
The start of ww1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V4TKTRV4HM0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6j4_SpM5s0
and the russian revolution

Sept 21 Third Season is a go