Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: The more kittens we post, the faster our region prospers; the less kittens we post, the slower our region prospers.

Author Topic: This thread is entirely off-topic  (Read 19363 times)

Offline Towlie

  • *
  • Posts: 740
  • austri surget iterum
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #30 on: February 24, 2008, 07:06:31 AM »
yall are being on topic by being off topic which is isnt really off topic cause it on topic
Sir, if you were my husband, I would poison your drink. --Lady Astor to Winston Churchill
Madam, if you were my wife, I would drink it. --His reply
When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading. --Henny Youngman

Offline Feniexia

  • *
  • Posts: 1459
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #31 on: February 24, 2008, 10:27:16 AM »
42.

Offline Akka-Wakka

  • Huzzah x Pink Waffle = Snowman of Doom
  • *
  • Posts: 1503
  • Huzzah!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #32 on: February 24, 2008, 11:35:46 AM »
 :wb:  :whip:

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #33 on: February 24, 2008, 12:47:47 PM »
35!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Offline The Empire

  • *
  • Posts: 2829
  • Glory to the dark gods!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #34 on: February 24, 2008, 01:25:39 PM »
The hunger! MUST DEVOOOOOUR!!!

Join the Word Bearer legion and brin glory to the dark gods! Taijitu stalker extraordinaire - no Taijituan presses a key without my knowledge, Resident Cannibal - I prefer females, Resident ginormous dragon - It is not a good idea to mess with a dragon who is packing heavy firepower

Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #35 on: February 24, 2008, 01:42:29 PM »
White hole
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the Red Dwarf episode, see White Hole (Red Dwarf episode).
In astrophysics, a white hole is the time reversal of a black hole. While a black hole acts as an absorber for any matter that crosses the event horizon, a white hole acts as a source that ejects matter from its event horizon. The sign of the acceleration is invariant under time reversal, so both black and white holes attract matter. The only potential difference between them is in the behavior at the horizon.

Stephen Hawking has argued that white holes are the same as black holes, once quantum mechanics is taken into account.

Contents [hide]
1 Relation to Quantum Mechanical Black Holes
2 Origin
3 Recent Speculations
4 See also
5 References
6 External links
 


[edit] Relation to Quantum Mechanical Black Holes
Black hole horizons can only absorb matter, while white hole horizons ostensibly recede from any incoming matter at the local speed of light, so that the infalling matter never crosses. The infalling matter is then scattered and reemitted at the death of the white hole, receding to infinity after having come very very close to the final singular point where the white hole is destroyed. The total proper time until an infalling object encounters the singular endpoint is the same as the proper time to be swallowed by a black hole, so the white hole picture does not say what happens to the infalling matter. Ignoring the classically unpredictable emissions of the white hole, the white hole and black hole are indistinguishable for external observers.

In quantum mechanics, the black hole emits Hawking radiation, and so can come to thermal equilibrium with a gas of radiation. Since a thermal equilbrium state is time reversal invariant, Hawking argued that the time reverse of a black hole in thermal equilibrium is again a black hole in thermal equilibrium.[1] This implies that black holes and white holes are the same object. The Hawking radiation from an ordinary black hole is then identified with the white hole emission. Hawking's semi-classical argument is reproduced in a quantum mechanical AdS/CFT treatment[2], where a black hole in Anti De Sitter space is described by a thermal gas in a gauge theory, whose time reversal is the same as itself.


[edit] Origin
White holes appear as part of the vacuum solution to the Einstein field equations describing a Schwarzschild wormhole. One end of this type of wormhole is a black hole, drawing in matter, and the other is a white hole, emitting matter. While this gives the impression that black holes in our universe may connect to white holes elsewhere, in reality, this is untrue, for two reasons. First, Schwarzschild wormholes are unstable, disconnecting as soon as they form. Second, Schwarzschild wormholes are only a solution to the Einstein field equations in vacuum (when no matter interacts with the hole). Real black holes are formed by the collapse of stars. When the infalling stellar matter is added to a diagram of a black hole's history, it removes the part of the diagram corresponding to the white hole [1].

The existence of white holes that are not part of a wormhole is doubtful, as they appear to violate the second law of thermodynamics.

Quasars and active galactic nuclei are observed to spew out jets of matter. This is now believed to be the result of polar jets formed when matter falls into supermassive black holes at the centers of these objects. Prior to this model, white holes emitting matter were one possible explanation proposed.


[edit] Recent Speculations
A more recently proposed view of black holes might be interpreted as shedding some light on the nature of classical white holes. Some researchers proposed that when a black hole forms, a big bang occurs at the core which creates a new universe that expands into extra dimensions outside of the parent universe[3]. See also Fecund universes.

The initial feeding of matter from the parent universe's black hole and the expansion that follows in the new universe might be thought of as a cosmological type of white hole. Unlike traditional white holes, this type of white hole would not be localized in space in the new universe and its horizon would have to be identified with the cosmological horizon.

Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #36 on: February 24, 2008, 08:24:40 PM »
White hole: My last girlfriend >_>



Offline Akka-Wakka

  • Huzzah x Pink Waffle = Snowman of Doom
  • *
  • Posts: 1503
  • Huzzah!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #37 on: February 24, 2008, 08:28:48 PM »
 :tai: may the force be with you.

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #38 on: February 24, 2008, 08:33:00 PM »



Offline The Empire

  • *
  • Posts: 2829
  • Glory to the dark gods!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #39 on: February 24, 2008, 08:42:18 PM »
White hole: My last girlfriend >_>

Ouch!....

Join the Word Bearer legion and brin glory to the dark gods! Taijitu stalker extraordinaire - no Taijituan presses a key without my knowledge, Resident Cannibal - I prefer females, Resident ginormous dragon - It is not a good idea to mess with a dragon who is packing heavy firepower

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #40 on: February 24, 2008, 08:45:01 PM »
<_<

>_>



Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #41 on: February 24, 2008, 08:51:20 PM »
EAT ME!
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline kor

  • Fluffy, Pink Boytoy
  • *
  • Posts: 4678
  • O HAI THAR!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #42 on: February 24, 2008, 09:23:39 PM »
Ewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!



Offline Bara

  • *
  • Posts: 10033
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #43 on: February 24, 2008, 09:28:13 PM »
really?
Bara, King of Spam, Slayer of Spelling, Vanquisher of Grammar.

Offline Akka-Wakka

  • Huzzah x Pink Waffle = Snowman of Doom
  • *
  • Posts: 1503
  • Huzzah!
Re: This thread is entirely off-topic
« Reply #44 on: February 24, 2008, 09:39:02 PM »
Happy Hour!!!!