The support is appreciated.
Are there really no more questions? I'm feeling ignored relative to my opponents.
Also, if I may I'd like to comment on some statements made by my opponents here rather than intrude upon their own campaigns.
If - and this is just hypothetical - the Senate passed a law, say, really banning avatars, it would be legal, no matter how much the rest of Taijitu disagreed with it.
Other than the fact that it is grossly unconstitutional. Of course, some will say that the Justices, because they're in the Senate, won't strike it down, but that's nonsense. As I said previously as Senators they are not beholden to anyone else; they are also beholden to their own ideas and principles, the same ones that the will always put into practice as Justices regardless of whether or not we allow for them to be represented. If any justice refused to strike down such a law it would not be because they were in the Senate and that being so somehow compelled them to automatically agree with whatever legislation the body passed. It would be because they were simply inherently corrupt and a poor choice for Justice.
As for your second question, I don't think I'm better than anyone. But I am more of a progress than the others. Pragmia has been Speaker of the House for what, two terms? And everyone knows running the Senate virtually means you run the region.
I would suggest that Myroria try out the Office of the Speaker before he makes such ridiculous statements. Being Speaker does not give you some mystical ability to implement legislation by decree.