Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

News: If a neighbor is in need of revolutionary rehabilitation, report it to the Citizen-Liaision!

Author Topic: The Hobbit  (Read 3663 times)

Online Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
The Hobbit
« on: December 17, 2012, 02:34:42 AM »
The Hobbit...ah...great disappointment. If you haven't went to see it, FOR THE LOVE OF CINEMA, DON'T!!!

3 main problems:
Outdated = LOTR was great in it's tine, was pretty much set out the last greatest movie where you could abuse slow motion and animated effects. All beyond from there try to run away from over rendering their movies, slowmotion, camera panning, fast panning for action etc. The Hobbit does it all, worse than the LOTR triology because, not only out of it's time, also 10 times more recurring.

Long, boring, silly = It's 3 hours long, there's dead scenes with few angles, no action, just an old man scribbling, a young man sitting on a bench smoking, a ton of men eating food like pigs and throwing things around, running, more running, silly jokes and puns, more running. Very few moments you feel integrated in the story, either one long boring thing happening or several different things happening where you can't grasp wtf is really going on, matching this with fast camera panning and you can't really understand what is even being filmed.

Incomplete = While the original LOTR triology was 3 movies and you could watch each movie and a singular story, even if you'd understand there's more to it, they had a beginning, body and ending. The Hobbit took a ton of time to begin, very boring and long start without giving you much to hold on to, the body is filled with either mindless action of running around, or no action and lots of talking, and THERE IS NO ENDING! Somebody told me it'll be 4 films for The Hobbit, WTF! If they're remotely similar to this first Hobbit I'm not going to the cinema to watch it!

One thing stands as virtue, the actors, not all of them, but the main actors are good, specially Martin Freeman, main actor from Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, the only way they could possible pull off the silliness of the whole thing, I can't think of anybody else that could save Bilbo to be a realistic lucky fool.

This movie is so not worth my money nor Martin Freeman's torture.

Offline St Oz

  • Sub-Commandante
  • Citizen-Delegate
  • *
  • Posts: 2158
  • www.something.com
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2012, 03:11:00 PM »
I don't think you understand english fantasy. If you read the hobbit or the lotr series, you'd know all about pointless sitting around and quick action.

Online Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #2 on: December 17, 2012, 05:05:09 PM »
I like the books, they're good, and the original LOTR trilogy isn't as bad, mind the context of being 10 years old. 007 Quantum of Solace has pointless sitting or talking and (very) quick action yet it's better filmed and better edited. I'm not saying the story is bad, I'm doubting Peter Jackson's or New Line Cinema's ability to turn Tolkien's books into a movie. Mind Tolkien wrote The Hobbit in one book, not 3 movies. It seemed to me there was too much effort on wasting time to extend the story into 3 movies instead of trying to cut it in 2 or 1. There's way too much panning with landscape, panning with people running, panning fast with action, I'm sorry but it's truly outdated, maybe it'd work 10 years ago together with LOTR and Matrix, but not today.

I'm reviewing the movie as a cinema piece, not a part of Tolkien's work or LOTR franchise, it's very clever to make it in 3 movies, it's very clever to have gotten good actors to make it work.

Offline Letonna

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 497
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2012, 12:10:45 AM »
I think I'll still give it a swing

Offline Eluvatar

  • Tech Monkey
  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 3111
  • O_O
    • Taijitu.org
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2013, 07:00:30 PM »
I was disappointed with this film. It completely departed from the tone of the Hobbit to splice in unnecessary additional action and drama.
                                 
(click to show/hide)

Offline Lapeirousia

  • Foreign Dignitary
  • *
  • Posts: 211
    • me=ISFP
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2013, 05:38:23 PM »
I missed this film when it came out and now not sure whether to watch it at the next opportunity.

I loved the LOTR trilogy so was really looking forward to this one.  How bad can it be?
Niadh Tabaqui Dion Diablessa

Online Delfos

  • Citizen
  • *
  • Posts: 6975
  • Who is Aniane?
Re: The Hobbit
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2013, 10:14:24 AM »
If you can still sit through the original trilogy then this is the movie for you. It has tons of slowmotion or fast panning and panning over landscape and singing, that's about it. Oh and fat jokes! You don't really get to know the fat dwarf but you get to mock it in every opportunity. Jarjar Binks?

Just watch it and tell us what you think, we lack of better perspectives anyway.